↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Potassium homeostasis and management of dyskalemia in kidney diseases: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Overview of attention for article published in Kidney International, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 5,207)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
149 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Potassium homeostasis and management of dyskalemia in kidney diseases: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference
Published in
Kidney International, January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Clase, Juan-Jesus Carrero, David H. Ellison, Morgan E. Grams, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Meg J. Jardine, Csaba P. Kovesdy, Gregory A. Kline, Gregor Lindner, Gregorio T. Obrador, Biff F. Palmer, Michael Cheung, David C. Wheeler, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Gloria E. Ashuntantang, Stephan J.L. Bakker, George L. Bakris, Sunil Bhandari, Emmanuel A. Burdmann, Katrina L. Campbell, David M. Charytan, Deborah J. Clegg, Lilian Cuppari, David Goldsmith, Stein I. Hallan, Jiang He, Charles A. Herzog, Melanie P. Hoenig, Ewout J. Hoorn, Jens Georg Leipziger, Amanda K. Leonberg-Yoo, Edgar V. Lerma, Jose Ernesto Lopez-Almaraz, Jolanta Małyszko, Johannes F.E. Mann, Matti Marklund, Alicia A. McDonough, Masahiko Nagahama, Sankar D. Navaneethan, Bertram Pitt, Oleh M. Pochynyuk, Thyago Proença de Moraes, Zubaid Rafique, Bruce M. Robinson, Simon D. Roger, Patrick Rossignol, Adam J. Singer, Andrew Smyth, Manish M. Sood, Michael Walsh, Matthew R. Weir, Charles S. Wingo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 23%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#178,094
of 14,158,001 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#13
of 5,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,302
of 263,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#2
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,158,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.