↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Potassium homeostasis and management of dyskalemia in kidney diseases: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Overview of attention for article published in Kidney International, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 7,473)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1137 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
290 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
488 Mendeley
Title
Potassium homeostasis and management of dyskalemia in kidney diseases: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference
Published in
Kidney International, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Clase, Juan-Jesus Carrero, David H. Ellison, Morgan E. Grams, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Meg J. Jardine, Csaba P. Kovesdy, Gregory A. Kline, Gregor Lindner, Gregorio T. Obrador, Biff F. Palmer, Michael Cheung, David C. Wheeler, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Conference Participants, Gloria E. Ashuntantang, Stephan J.L. Bakker, George L. Bakris, Sunil Bhandari, Emmanuel A. Burdmann, Katrina L. Campbell, David M. Charytan, Deborah J. Clegg, Lilian Cuppari, David Goldsmith, Stein I. Hallan, Jiang He, Charles A. Herzog, Melanie P. Hoenig, Ewout J. Hoorn, Jens Georg Leipziger, Amanda K. Leonberg-Yoo, Edgar V. Lerma, Jose Ernesto Lopez-Almaraz, Jolanta Małyszko, Johannes F.E. Mann, Matti Marklund, Alicia A. McDonough, Masahiko Nagahama, Sankar D. Navaneethan, Bertram Pitt, Oleh M. Pochynyuk, Thyago Proença de Moraes, Zubaid Rafique, Bruce M. Robinson, Simon D. Roger, Patrick Rossignol, Adam J. Singer, Andrew Smyth, Manish M. Sood, Michael Walsh, Matthew R. Weir, Charles S. Wingo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 488 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 12%
Student > Postgraduate 44 9%
Other 43 9%
Student > Master 36 7%
Researcher 33 7%
Other 101 21%
Unknown 172 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 177 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 716. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#29,048
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#6
of 7,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#587
of 367,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#1
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.