↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Potassium homeostasis and management of dyskalemia in kidney diseases: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Overview of attention for article published in Kidney International, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 5,661)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
293 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Potassium homeostasis and management of dyskalemia in kidney diseases: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference
Published in
Kidney International, January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Clase, Juan-Jesus Carrero, David H. Ellison, Morgan E. Grams, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Meg J. Jardine, Csaba P. Kovesdy, Gregory A. Kline, Gregor Lindner, Gregorio T. Obrador, Biff F. Palmer, Michael Cheung, David C. Wheeler, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Gloria E. Ashuntantang, Stephan J.L. Bakker, George L. Bakris, Sunil Bhandari, Emmanuel A. Burdmann, Katrina L. Campbell, David M. Charytan, Deborah J. Clegg, Lilian Cuppari, David Goldsmith, Stein I. Hallan, Jiang He, Charles A. Herzog, Melanie P. Hoenig, Ewout J. Hoorn, Jens Georg Leipziger, Amanda K. Leonberg-Yoo, Edgar V. Lerma, Jose Ernesto Lopez-Almaraz, Jolanta Małyszko, Johannes F.E. Mann, Matti Marklund, Alicia A. McDonough, Masahiko Nagahama, Sankar D. Navaneethan, Bertram Pitt, Oleh M. Pochynyuk, Thyago Proença de Moraes, Zubaid Rafique, Bruce M. Robinson, Simon D. Roger, Patrick Rossignol, Adam J. Singer, Andrew Smyth, Manish M. Sood, Michael Walsh, Matthew R. Weir, Charles S. Wingo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 293 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 17%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Professor 9 7%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 22 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#87,748
of 15,622,115 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#12
of 5,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,637
of 272,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,622,115 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.