| Title |
Association of Patient Priorities–Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary E. Tinetti, Aanand D. Naik, Lilian Dindo, Darce M. Costello, Jessica Esterson, Mary Geda, Jonathan Rosen, Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos, Cynthia Daisy Smith, Gregory M. Ouellet, Gina Kang, Yungah Lee, Caroline Blaum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 59 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 8% |
| Australia | 13 | 6% |
| Spain | 12 | 5% |
| Canada | 8 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 87 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 120 | 53% |
| Scientists | 62 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#191,276
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#1,014
of 11,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,303
of 480,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#27
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.