↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Association of Patient Priorities–Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Association of Patient Priorities–Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary E. Tinetti, Aanand D. Naik, Lilian Dindo, Darce M. Costello, Jessica Esterson, Mary Geda, Jonathan Rosen, Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos, Cynthia Daisy Smith, Gregory M. Ouellet, Gina Kang, Yungah Lee, Caroline Blaum

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 254 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#71,641
of 14,000,198 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#599
of 3,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,438
of 260,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#39
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,000,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 131.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.