| Title |
Risk of Major Complications After Perioperative Norepinephrine Infusion Through Peripheral Intravenous Lines in a Multicenter Study.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anesthesia and analgesia, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1213/ane.0000000000004445 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlo Pancaro, Nirav Shah, Wietze Pasma, Leif Saager, Ruth Cassidy, Wilton van Klei, Fabian Kooij, Dave Vittali, Markus W Hollmann, Sachin Kheterpal, Philipp Lirk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 243 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 11% |
| Canada | 17 | 7% |
| Colombia | 11 | 5% |
| Spain | 11 | 5% |
| Japan | 8 | 3% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 85 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 183 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 12% |
| Scientists | 28 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 22% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#209,932
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#32
of 8,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,200
of 359,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#1
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.