| Title |
Gout
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41572-019-0115-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Dalbeth, Hyon K. Choi, Leo A. B. Joosten, Puja P. Khanna, Hirotaka Matsuo, Fernando Perez-Ruiz, Lisa K. Stamp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 196 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 31 | 16% |
| United States | 19 | 10% |
| Spain | 16 | 8% |
| Colombia | 7 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 85 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 155 | 79% |
| Scientists | 21 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 355 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 7% |
| Researcher | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 120 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 10% |
| Unknown | 127 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#275,859
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#118
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,668
of 359,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.