| Title |
IFN-γ enhances cell-mediated cytotoxicity against keratinocytes via JAK2/STAT1 in lichen planus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Translational Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav7561 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuai Shao, Lam C Tsoi, Mrinal K Sarkar, Xianying Xing, Ke Xue, Ranjitha Uppala, Celine C Berthier, Chang Zeng, Matthew Patrick, Allison C Billi, Joseph Fullmer, Maria A Beamer, Bethany Perez-White, Spiro Getsios, Andrew Schuler, John J Voorhees, Sung Choi, Paul Harms, J Michelle Kahlenberg, Johann E Gudjonsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 36% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 28% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,195,072
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#2,302
of 5,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,350
of 358,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#53
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.