| Title |
Institutional Report Cards for Gender Equality: Lessons Learned from Benchmarking Efforts for Women in STEM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Stem Cell, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Whitney H. Beeler, Kristin A. Smith-Doody, Richard Ha, Raeka S. Aiyar, Elizabeth Schwarzbach, Susan L. Solomon, Reshma Jagsi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 12% |
| Australia | 13 | 11% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 50% |
| Scientists | 50 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 26% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#239,432
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from Cell Stem Cell
#138
of 2,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,730
of 350,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Stem Cell
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.