| Title |
Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Nano, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acsnano.9b04224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith Langer, Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi, Javier Aizpurua, Ramon A. Alvarez-Puebla, Baptiste Auguié, Jeremy J. Baumberg, Guillermo C. Bazan, Steven E. J. Bell, Anja Boisen, Alexandre G. Brolo, Jaebum Choo, Dana Cialla-May, Volker Deckert, Laura Fabris, Karen Faulds, F. Javier García de Abajo, Royston Goodacre, Duncan Graham, Amanda J. Haes, Christy L. Haynes, Christian Huck, Tamitake Itoh, Mikael Käll, Janina Kneipp, Nicholas A. Kotov, Hua Kuang, Eric C. Le Ru, Hiang Kwee Lee, Jian-Feng Li, Xing Yi Ling, Stefan A. Maier, Thomas Mayerhöfer, Martin Moskovits, Kei Murakoshi, Jwa-Min Nam, Shuming Nie, Yukihiro Ozaki, Isabel Pastoriza-Santos, Jorge Perez-Juste, Juergen Popp, Annemarie Pucci, Stephanie Reich, Bin Ren, George C. Schatz, Timur Shegai, Sebastian Schlücker, Li-Lin Tay, K. George Thomas, Zhong-Qun Tian, Richard P. Van Duyne, Tuan Vo-Dinh, Yue Wang, Katherine A. Willets, Chuanlai Xu, Hongxing Xu, Yikai Xu, Yuko S. Yamamoto, Bing Zhao, Luis M. Liz-Marzán |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 13% |
| United States | 12 | 11% |
| Canada | 11 | 10% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 50% |
| Scientists | 54 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,050 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2050 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 428 | 21% |
| Researcher | 256 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 192 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 149 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 90 | 4% |
| Other | 226 | 11% |
| Unknown | 709 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 401 | 20% |
| Materials Science | 195 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 186 | 9% |
| Engineering | 158 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 76 | 4% |
| Other | 219 | 11% |
| Unknown | 815 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#290,383
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#189
of 15,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,762
of 353,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#4
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.