RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
"Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news" https://t.co/PLVxVjSjSG by @s_soroka @pat_fournier People gravitate to negative news. I believe wellness industry leverages this negativity bias (fearmongering!) to se
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
RT @EricTopol: The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic…
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
RT @EricTopol: The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic…
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
RT @bnbakker: In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiol…
In a unique @PNASNews study @s_soroka, @pat_fournier & Nir show that "all around the world, the average human is more physiologically activated by negative than by positive news stories". https://t.co/l6vmsHAuwS. Some thoughts & findings:
RT @MichaelSagnerMD: What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more…
RT @EricTopol: The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic…
RT @EricTopol: The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic…
RT @EricTopol: The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic…
RT @EricTopol: The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic…
RT @EricTopol: The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic…
What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more strongly to negative than positive information. "If it bleeds, it leads.” @yaneerbaryam https://t.co/2ItA1vDqbb
The global negativity bias of news ("if it bleeds, it leads") and its adverse impact on heart rate variability and galvanic skin response: the case for more positive news @PNASNews by @s_soroka @UMich @pat_fournier @UMontreal & Lilach Nir @HebrewU ht
RT @acerbialberto: "This work [...] reports results from a 17-country, 6-continent experimental study examining psychophysiological reactio…
Por qué le damos más importancia a las noticias negativas. #sesgos @aracalacana
RT @acerbialberto: "This work [...] reports results from a 17-country, 6-continent experimental study examining psychophysiological reactio…
"This work [...] reports results from a 17-country, 6-continent experimental study examining psychophysiological reactions to real video news content. Results offer the most comprehensive cross-national demonstration of negativity biases to date" https://t