↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Deadoption of low-value practices in the ICU

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Critical Care, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Deadoption of low-value practices in the ICU
Published in
Current Opinion in Critical Care, October 2019
DOI 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Fung, Robert C. Hyzy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,773,802
of 14,033,278 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Critical Care
#220
of 1,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,261
of 252,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Critical Care
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,033,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.