↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 6,795)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
745 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care
Published in
Nature Medicine, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna Wiens, Suchi Saria, Mark Sendak, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Vincent X. Liu, Finale Doshi-Velez, Kenneth Jung, Katherine Heller, David Kale, Mohammed Saeed, Pilar N. Ossorio, Sonoo Thadaney-Israni, Anna Goldenberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 745 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 17%
Computer Science 24 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Engineering 17 10%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 47 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 737. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,394
of 14,189,319 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#40
of 6,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333
of 253,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#3
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,189,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.