| Title |
2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis & Rheumatology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/art.40930 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Aringer, Karen Costenbader, David Daikh, Ralph Brinks, Marta Mosca, Rosalind Ramsey‐Goldman, Josef S. Smolen, David Wofsy, Dimitrios T. Boumpas, Diane L. Kamen, David Jayne, Ricard Cervera, Nathalie Costedoat‐Chalumeau, Betty Diamond, Dafna D. Gladman, Bevra Hahn, Falk Hiepe, Søren Jacobsen, Dinesh Khanna, Kirsten Lerstrøm, Elena Massarotti, Joseph McCune, Guillermo Ruiz‐Irastorza, Jorge Sanchez‐Guerrero, Matthias Schneider, Murray Urowitz, George Bertsias, Bimba F. Hoyer, Nicolai Leuchten, Chiara Tani, Sara K. Tedeschi, Zahi Touma, Gabriela Schmajuk, Branimir Anic, Florence Assan, Tak Mao Chan, Ann Elaine Clarke, Mary K. Crow, László Czirják, Andrea Doria, Winfried Graninger, Bernadett Halda‐Kiss, Sarfaraz Hasni, Peter M. Izmirly, Michelle Jung, Gábor Kumánovics, Xavier Mariette, Ivan Padjen, José M. Pego‐Reigosa, Juanita Romero‐Diaz, Íñigo Rúa‐Figueroa Fernández, Raphaèle Seror, Georg H. Stummvoll, Yoshiya Tanaka, Maria G. Tektonidou, Carlos Vasconcelos, Edward M. Vital, Daniel J. Wallace, Sule Yavuz, Pier Luigi Meroni, Marvin J. Fritzler, Ray Naden, Thomas Dörner, Sindhu R. Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 245 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 52 | 21% |
| United States | 18 | 7% |
| Mexico | 17 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 10 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 5 | 2% |
| Colombia | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 94 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 191 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 16% |
| Scientists | 14 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,673 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1673 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 234 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 136 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 120 | 7% |
| Other | 117 | 7% |
| Researcher | 110 | 7% |
| Other | 251 | 15% |
| Unknown | 705 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 636 | 38% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 57 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 2% |
| Other | 121 | 7% |
| Unknown | 740 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#125,907
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#38
of 3,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,278
of 358,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#1
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.