Title |
The utility of iPhone oximetry apps: A comparison with standard pulse oximetry measurement in the emergency department
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Emergency Medicine, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.020 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taylor B Jordan, Cody L Meyers, Walter A Schrading, John P Donnelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 17 | 20% |
United States | 8 | 10% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 4% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 44 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 69 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
Scientists | 5 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
Engineering | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#290,053
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#54
of 6,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,672
of 359,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#3
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.