@arjunrajlab My point exactly, not getting cited can be a major issue for some. This is especially the case when some specific groups systematically get cited less frequently: https://t.co/I5EV6McESP https://t.co/U4ArWZ5MN1 Or get cited less due to other b
@AbdelmoumenAmir @NWONieuws Gendereffecten van high impact journals zijn klein, 5-10%, bekend en kunnen dus gecompenseerd worden. Ik vraag me af of het zonder getallen niet erger wordt. https://t.co/4l4ecTRgud
Vores egen forskning har f.eks. vist, at det meste af forskellen forsvinder, hvis man tager højde for forskningsfelt, internationalt samarbejde og den resterende forskel kan i høj grad tilskrives selv-citationer og valg af tidsskrift https://t.co/dPfKUZnDj
@SiccodeKnecht @RecogRewards @MarcelLevi 1/2 Welk onderzoek is dat dan? H-index en citaties zijn ongeveer 5-12% meer bij mannen maar deze verschillen verdwijnen als je corrigeert voor zelf-citaties en aantal auteurs (https://t.co/Yiux7W9BiR).
@Cody_N_Porter @criskotsu There are a variety of studies that find women get cited less, men self-cite more, etc. https://t.co/STQGiFveXx https://t.co/WVfuOis90K https://t.co/ckpaDXcsRk https://t.co/zNHMxihmA6
RT @LudoWaltman: Finally, paper by @ChatterjeePaula @rm_werner is about citations, but its own citations are interesting as well; it mainly…
Finally, paper by @ChatterjeePaula @rm_werner is about citations, but its own citations are interesting as well; it mainly cites papers in medical journals and doesn’t cite relevant bibliometric studies, like work by @schneider_jw @ipoga @mathiaswullum htt
RT @giannitsarou: More and more we see that the research gender gap during the pandemic is universal across disciplines. A good article abo…
More and more we see that the research gender gap during the pandemic is universal across disciplines. A good article about this in @nature today, also featuring our findings from economics: https://t.co/r2PV5TsUBV #EconTwitter
@_LukasFreund_ @giannitsarou @elisafaraglia @HasnaZeina @noriko_amanopat @FernandaStanis2 @parentinscience @AnnaFazack1 I was looking into COVID-19 biomedical publications gender disparities indeed! However, @ipoga did a much better job & just got int
This looks interesting. See also "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige: https://t.co/5b0jZl1804 in @eLife
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @schneider_jw: Interesting thread https://t.co/2vzAyX2qp7 on gender bias where among other things my colleague @mathiaswullum clarify th…
RT @jgschraiber: This is such a good point. You see this all the time in analyses of the gender gap in wages, usually said as "well women j…
RT @schneider_jw: Interesting thread https://t.co/2vzAyX2qp7 on gender bias where among other things my colleague @mathiaswullum clarify th…
RT @schneider_jw: Interesting thread https://t.co/2vzAyX2qp7 on gender bias where among other things my colleague @mathiaswullum clarify th…
RT @schneider_jw: Interesting thread https://t.co/2vzAyX2qp7 on gender bias where among other things my colleague @mathiaswullum clarify th…
Interesting thread https://t.co/2vzAyX2qp7 on gender bias where among other things my colleague @mathiaswullum clarify the approach and results in our recent eLife study: https://t.co/amhv3QbqyP
RT @DieterLukas: 🧵on studies on gender discrimination Think about it as causal model (h/t @rlmcelreath): We expect "gender➡️differential…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @jgschraiber: This is such a good point. You see this all the time in analyses of the gender gap in wages, usually said as "well women j…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @DieterLukas: 🧵on studies on gender discrimination Think about it as causal model (h/t @rlmcelreath): We expect "gender➡️differential…
😑
RT @jgschraiber: This is such a good point. You see this all the time in analyses of the gender gap in wages, usually said as "well women j…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @DieterLukas: 🧵on studies on gender discrimination Think about it as causal model (h/t @rlmcelreath): We expect "gender➡️differential…
🧵on studies on gender discrimination Think about it as causal model (h/t @rlmcelreath): We expect "gender➡️differential treatment➡️outcome". Models that include differential treatment no longer show an effect of gender on the outcome, but gender is still
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
This is such a good point. You see this all the time in analyses of the gender gap in wages, usually said as "well women just happen to by chance work at jobs that make less money! So if you control for that, they don't make less money!"
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @JohnSpeakman4 @lisalibrarian @Phil_Baty @trishgreenhalgh @THEworldunirank @PLOSONE @SociusJournal 7/ This is not uncommo…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @westwoodsam1: #164 self-citation and journal prestige explain a good deal of gender variations in citation distributions in medicine 🤯…
#164 self-citation and journal prestige explain a good deal of gender variations in citation distributions in medicine 🤯 https://t.co/XIHLfoqJT1 @ipoga Schneider @reshmajagsi Nielsen https://t.co/SFnIuc6aIL
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @thaasophobia: Many issues here. Alternative title: "Sex-differences in citation counts are driven by self-citation and journal acceptan…
Many issues here. Alternative title: "Sex-differences in citation counts are driven by self-citation and journal acceptance bias."
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @INM7_ISN: "Our study demonstrates the importance of focusing greater attention on within-group variability and between-group overlap of…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
"Our study demonstrates the importance of focusing greater attention on within-group variability and between-group overlap of distributions" New study @eLife: gender differences in citation rates largely explained by self-citation & journal prestige.
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and female authors are largely explained by self-citation and journal prestige https://t.co/Gdfr1uFLPs #MetaResearch
RT @eLife: "The authors are to be commended for an encompassing piece of work – literature review, data collection and analyses – on a very…
Meta-Research: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige https://t.co/kvLVoIywNq
RT @eLife: "The authors are to be commended for an encompassing piece of work – literature review, data collection and analyses – on a very…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
"The authors are to be commended for an encompassing piece of work – literature review, data collection and analyses – on a very important and contentious topic in connection to the gender gap in science" https://t.co/J9tVbAvFxh #fromthedecisionletter #Pub
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @johanvawe: When #gender #gap in academia meets #DataMining #BigData https://t.co/WcDfjJmgVl
When #gender #gap in academia meets #DataMining #BigData
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
RT @eLife: A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and…
After adjusting for several confounders, the authors find near-identical per-paper citation impact for women and men in first and last author positions. This is reassuring, although expected as authors names are often initialed. https://t.co/DeINIXT5Oj
A matched case-control study of over 1.2 million medical papers finds that differences in the citation distributions of male and female authors are largely explained by self-citation and journal prestige https://t.co/Gdfr1uFLPs #MetaResearch
RT @vinwalsh: "Adjusting for self-citations, number of authors, intl collaboration & journal prestige, we find near-identical per-paper cit…
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
RT @vinwalsh: "Adjusting for self-citations, number of authors, intl collaboration & journal prestige, we find near-identical per-paper cit…
„Meta-Research: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige“ | @eLife https://t.co/Wr9vkVB6hZ
Meta-Research: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige https://t.co/X9tEnNFF0e
Meta-Research: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige https://t.co/9Hwh8IBpdg
Meta-Research: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige https://t.co/nxHO4vxIdF
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
RT @schneider_jw: Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and…
Our new meta-research paper is out in eLife: "Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige" https://t.co/amhv3QbqyP
RT @ipoga: 1/ Are women scientists less cited than men? Our new paper in @eLife (with @mathiaswullum @schneider_jw @reshmajagsi) challenges…
RT @ipoga: 1/ Are women scientists less cited than men? Our new paper in @eLife (with @mathiaswullum @schneider_jw @reshmajagsi) challenges…
RT @ipoga: Vi har for nylig udgivet en artikel om forskellen på mandlige og kvindelige forskeres citationer. Det har @weekendavisen skrevet…
RT @ipoga: Vi har for nylig udgivet en artikel om forskellen på mandlige og kvindelige forskeres citationer. Det har @weekendavisen skrevet…
Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige https://t.co/nE7adxVZHP