| Title |
Access to Primary Care Clinics for Patients With Chronic Pain Receiving Opioids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pooja A. Lagisetty, Nathaniel Healy, Claire Garpestad, Mary Jannausch, Renuka Tipirneni, Amy S. B. Bohnert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 404 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 197 | 49% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 326 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 10% |
| Scientists | 34 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 26% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 712. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#29,200
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#310
of 9,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#549
of 361,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#7
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.