↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

CRISPR knockout screen implicates three genes in lysosome function

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
CRISPR knockout screen implicates three genes in lysosome function
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-45939-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy M. Lenk, Young N. Park, Rosemary Lemons, Emma Flynn, Margaret Plank, Christen M. Frei, Michael J. Davis, Brian Gregorka, Joel A. Swanson, Miriam H. Meisler, Jacob O. Kitzman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,859,710
of 14,125,937 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#23,925
of 72,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,614
of 254,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,125,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them