↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

CRISPR knockout screen implicates three genes in lysosome function

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
CRISPR knockout screen implicates three genes in lysosome function
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-45939-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy M. Lenk, Young N. Park, Rosemary Lemons, Emma Flynn, Margaret Plank, Christen M. Frei, Michael J. Davis, Brian Gregorka, Joel A. Swanson, Miriam H. Meisler, Jacob O. Kitzman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,262,228
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#42,354
of 125,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,103
of 348,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,188
of 3,299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.