Title |
Investigating the Robustness of the Illusory Truth Effect Across Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Cognitive Style
|
---|---|
Published in |
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1177/0146167219853844 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonas De keersmaecker, David Dunning, Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand, Carmen Sanchez, Christian Unkelbach, Arne Roets |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 66 | 33% |
United States | 10 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
Turkey | 4 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Antarctica | 1 | <1% |
Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 102 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 171 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 6% |
Scientists | 12 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
Lecturer | 12 | 8% |
Researcher | 9 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 20% |
Unknown | 53 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 47 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 54 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#223,772
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#164
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,426
of 368,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.