What conditions enable US presidents to pull the Supreme Court closer to their own ideological preferences? Explore this analysis of presidential nominations in The Journal of Politics, @The_JOP: https://t.co/gWN6u49ZsM https://t.co/JwnmeNdOrd
@gm_silverman The last author of this paper (Richard Anderson) worked for the LA Angels and now the Reds: https://t.co/RPMQKgZMep
@meteste @jmarianosilva @meirelesff @marjoriemarona @rogeriobarantes @fabiokerche Por aí. A teoria nos diz que a escolha do presidente é constrangida pelas preferências dos senadores. Apesar de não termos uma evidência sólida como nos EUA -https://t.co/K0l
Nobody has a cooler academic affiliation than my friend Richard. https://t.co/71xwPxpQtt https://t.co/dGR2L7BiaM
RT @JKastellec: This has to be most of the most interesting affiliations to ever appear in @The_JOP : https://t.co/Mej1ZH7irn https://t.co…
This has to be most of the most interesting affiliations to ever appear in @The_JOP : https://t.co/Mej1ZH7irn https://t.co/SdH473JPeX
RT @MattGrossmann: president’s power to appoint new members of the Supreme Court moves Court toward his ideological views; Senate constrain…
RT @MattGrossmann: president’s power to appoint new members of the Supreme Court moves Court toward his ideological views; Senate constrain…
RT @MattGrossmann: president’s power to appoint new members of the Supreme Court moves Court toward his ideological views; Senate constrain…
Somehow I doubt that this theory will hold for too much longer.
president’s power to appoint new members of the Supreme Court moves Court toward his ideological views; Senate constraints are not too restrictive; presidents achieve ideological gains above what the Senate should allow #SocSciResearch https://t.co/2Xjrhu