↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Intramuscular versus Intravenous Therapy for Prehospital Status Epilepticus

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
603 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Intramuscular versus Intravenous Therapy for Prehospital Status Epilepticus
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1107494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Silbergleit, Valerie Durkalski, Daniel Lowenstein, Robin Conwit, Arthur Pancioli, Yuko Palesch, William Barsan

Abstract

Early termination of prolonged seizures with intravenous administration of benzodiazepines improves outcomes. For faster and more reliable administration, paramedics increasingly use an intramuscular route.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 396 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 73 18%
Researcher 63 16%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Postgraduate 35 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 6%
Other 78 19%
Unknown 92 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 6%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 24 6%
Unknown 116 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#213,452
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,023
of 32,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#874
of 168,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#25
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.