| Title |
An observational study investigating the use of patient-owned technology to quantify physical activity in survivors of critical illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses., March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.01.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Gluck, Matthew James Summers, Mark Edward Finnis, Alice Andrawos, Thomas Paul Goddard, Carol Lynette Hodgson, Theodore John Iwashyna, Adam Michael Deane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 48% |
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,486,929
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.
#136
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,879
of 365,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.