↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

A Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Febrile Infants 60 Days and Younger at Low Risk for Serious Bacterial Infections

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Pediatrics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
345 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
A Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Febrile Infants 60 Days and Younger at Low Risk for Serious Bacterial Infections
Published in
JAMA Pediatrics, April 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan Kuppermann, Peter S. Dayan, Deborah A. Levine, Melissa Vitale, Leah Tzimenatos, Michael G. Tunik, Mary Saunders, Richard M. Ruddy, Genie Roosevelt, Alexander J. Rogers, Elizabeth C. Powell, Lise E. Nigrovic, Jared Muenzer, James G. Linakis, Kathleen Grisanti, David M. Jaffe, John D. Hoyle, Richard Greenberg, Rajender Gattu, Andrea T. Cruz, Ellen F. Crain, Daniel M. Cohen, Anne Brayer, Dominic Borgialli, Bema Bonsu, Lorin Browne, Stephen Blumberg, Jonathan E. Bennett, Shireen M. Atabaki, Jennifer Anders, Elizabeth R. Alpern, Benjamin Miller, T. Charles Casper, J. Michael Dean, Octavio Ramilo, Prashant Mahajan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 345 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 31 22%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Postgraduate 17 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 26 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#45,485
of 15,148,160 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Pediatrics
#160
of 2,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,422
of 265,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Pediatrics
#10
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,148,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.