↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Unraveling Prostate Cancer Genomics, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visibility

Overview of attention for article published in European Urology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 tweeters
Title
Unraveling Prostate Cancer Genomics, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visibility
Published in
European Urology, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan E. Shoag, Jeffrey J. Tosoian, Simpa S. Salami, Christopher E. Barbieri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#445,455
of 12,533,639 outputs
Outputs from European Urology
#380
of 3,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,565
of 160,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology
#26
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,533,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.