| Title |
Patient-reported complications related to peripherally inserted central catheters: a multicentre prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008726 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah L Krein, Sanjay Saint, Barbara W Trautner, Latoya Kuhn, John Colozzi, David Ratz, Erica Lescinskas, Vineet Chopra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 26% |
| Scientists | 11 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#797,224
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#304
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,746
of 446,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.