RT @LawtonTri: @SGriffin_Lab They did a parachute RCT! I think they had a relatively high dropout rate in one of the arms, but overall it s…
RT @LawtonTri: @SGriffin_Lab They did a parachute RCT! I think they had a relatively high dropout rate in one of the arms, but overall it s…
@SGriffin_Lab They did a parachute RCT! I think they had a relatively high dropout rate in one of the arms, but overall it seems pretty conclusive that these so-called engineers are just scaring everyone by insisting on parachutes for high-altitude jumps.
@keeluu Vielen Dank für das schöne Fallschirm Beispiel aus https://t.co/uqc8cTmkf6 . Ich mag es sehr. Nur Ansteckungen laufen viel komplexer ab als der freie Fall. Das macht die Messung ja so schwierig.
@mariekehoogwout @Zenith24 @ZEMBLA @KuypersMarieke De effectiviteit van het dragen van een parachute bij het verlaten van een vliegtuig is ook maar tot op beperkte hoogte getest in RCTs (0,6 m https://t.co/UqAGdq0glI)
@EdKrassen @nathaliejacoby1 Recent studies have shown minimal difference in survival when jumping from a plane with and without a parachute. https://t.co/Bj90VfoyW9
RT @Mark_Ungrin: It can't tell you that the drug wouldn't have worked at a different dose, or on a different schedule. This is directly ana…
Użycie spadochronu nie zmniejszyło zgonów ani obrażeń pourazowych podczas skoków z samolotu. Do badania można było zapisać jedynie uczestników na małych stacjonarnych samolotach na ziemi, co sugeruje ostrożność ekstrapolacji na skoki z dużych wysokości. ht
@TuckerGoodrich We do have one for jumping out of an airplane with a parachute: https://t.co/TomuPRVIix
@Deming_WE No se puede definir mejor. Menuda memez. Pero claro, si se ha hecho un estudio sobre la utilidad del paracaídas, ya vale cualquier cosa.... 🤦 https://t.co/uhXZ4ZiTKF
@Dr_UJ @Jessica_D_PhD Ha, trodde du ja: https://t.co/ILK8WM2smu
More on RCTs and the flaws of "EBM": 1) https://t.co/LEbAUr56Re 2) https://t.co/xZCbJTtL7J
Skakali su sa pola metra visine, iz aviona na zemlji. Poenta je bila da se ilustruje problem sa uključivanjem učesnika (očekivano, niko nije hteo da učestvuje u eksperimentu na većoj visini) kao i problem veštačkih uslova i konteksta eksperimenata. 9/9 h
RT @exceptionalfood: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/P…
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/P05DAOFaH6 #MedTwitter #NurseTwitter #Equipoise
@osamu_iga これを思い出しました。 航空機からパラシュート有りと無しで飛び降りたが、死傷率に有意差は無く、パラシュートの効果が認められなかったというランダム化比較試験 https://t.co/VKlEHX6YNU
@Adespoto3 @andrew1logue @colmpbyrne Lack of evidence does not mean no evidence. Not all evidence can be relied upon either. See attached report. https://t.co/p68REE12K4
An all-timer https://t.co/UZ5SRrm5zo
@lucindasan15671 It’s reasonable to question whether an RCT of a non-pharmaceutical, engineered solution is even appropriate. https://t.co/DCxnwaTeyU
@gmurphycoaching Here's one - a randomised control trial for parachuting. Nice one to demonstrate the limits of an RCT but perhaps will benefit from some explaining from your side! https://t.co/B1BDYNekHu
@Once_Was_Arnold @YouAreLobbyLud Outrageous. I was similarly annoyed to see Boeing’s outrageous claims, like the 787-8 I was on recently is “incredibly safe”. They have no RCT evidence at all to back this up. At least I was pleased not to be offered a usel
Amazing talk by @michaelyehmd on social media use.
RT @michaelyehmd: Truly timeless 😅 @rwyeh @rkwadhera @EricSecemskyMD
Truly timeless 😅 @rwyeh @rkwadhera @EricSecemskyMD
@michaelyehmd sharing tips for social media use for #EndocrineSurgery (be kind) and reminding us to read the infamous #PARACHUTEtrial @AmThyroidAssn @TheAAES #ATA2023 #Thyroid2023 @MaliniGuptaMD @endo_mad https://t.co/jsDNzlpOMn https://t.co/pcQnrlTQxr
@ScienceAccion El mundo de los estudios aleatorizados es apasionante. Si se ha hecho uno sobre la utilidad del paracaídas, ya me creo cualquier cosa.... 🤦 https://t.co/uhXZ4ZjrAd
@MicahZoltu @mkaeberlein Unrelated to point of this thread, but in fact only published RCT I know of was negative: "Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury" https://t.co/L1OvdpxEqR Goes under lesson heading: details matter. See re
This is brilliant https://t.co/5KFTN9JQiU
RT @Mark_Ungrin: It can't tell you that the drug wouldn't have worked at a different dose, or on a different schedule. This is directly ana…
@MarvinH2_G2 @ejustin46 Good question, what about parachutes? No RCTs, no proof 🤔. https://t.co/jyxAQ0VLXT
@KeithMalinak
And like to some extent this is inevitable. If we did a big careful controlled trial to show that bleach is bad for you (or that parachutes can help protect you while falling https://t.co/pyU9Yzn8HW), no one would care because we already know that.
@greg_travis @MrSpIcEz @TimTrippDesign @ID_Denmark And (non-paywalled...) https://t.co/d7wx14imMe
Fascinating results as well, definitely a field that needs further research https://t.co/u669ttyzNY https://t.co/LMrD2Ijx7h
RT @dmcdaid: Nav Kapur's talk reminds me of famous study on effectiveness of parachutes #iasppiran2023 "Parachute use did not significantl…
Nav Kapur's talk reminds me of famous study on effectiveness of parachutes #iasppiran2023 "Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury (0% for parachute v 0% for control; P>0.9). This finding was consistent across multiple subgroup
@jxshir0 @shrewddudescast @KashPrime There is an rct for parachutes. They don't work https://t.co/QIY302Kn2e
RT @jvipondmd: But this isn't a medical intervention, it's a safety intervention. In the same way that seat belts or parachutes have never…
@D28EquityNow @CorsIAQ They’ve done the study, and the results are shocking! https://t.co/M8O28RaDrZ
Ufajcie nauce! @PiotrWitczak_
@rnadworny There is, and it's hilarious https://t.co/74oNSLYNyZ
@Foo69420 @jsm2334 Here it is! https://t.co/ketH8R6niG
Brilliant medical research here https://t.co/rQd5B4LhsY
RT @ploz66: @toadmeister How about this peer reviewed paper - wearing parachutes no safer than not wearing parachutes when jumping out of p…
@toadmeister How about this peer reviewed paper - wearing parachutes no safer than not wearing parachutes when jumping out of plane! https://t.co/wx7eh52BJf
RT @UroFuchs1: Eine Studie beweist: Fallschirme schützen nicht vor Verletzungen, wenn man aus einem Flugzeug springt.😂 https://t.co/SrlFWs…
RT @UroFuchs1: Eine Studie beweist: Fallschirme schützen nicht vor Verletzungen, wenn man aus einem Flugzeug springt.😂 https://t.co/SrlFWs…
Eine Studie beweist: Fallschirme schützen nicht vor Verletzungen, wenn man aus einem Flugzeug springt.😂 https://t.co/SrlFWsHXmA
@JulzL2 @RealGregBoulden @aftab_usa A lot of the insistence about rct always reminds me of the authors of the parachute trial https://t.co/SC5NUs50Gt
@vass_vassiliou @ScottFSMunro But..... 1) the RCT found no benefit to parachutes (context is everything): https://t.co/TiUhiUbOYT 😀 2) Many "parachutes" in healthcare are not as good as we think: https://t.co/S7rMl09I1N
@pan_accindex @19joho Science now has a definitive answer. Parachutes do not work! https://t.co/A605b0E9Zb
@rwdcsw @jayrayner1 @timspector Like this one you mean? https://t.co/YAnvmojKgT
RT @fallenigloos: @assignedmedia I mean https://t.co/Bz2Qfob0PU
RT @YarrowAngelweed: @BadWritingTakes “evidence supporting the efficacy of parachutes is weak and guideline recommendations for their use a…
RT @YarrowAngelweed: @BadWritingTakes “evidence supporting the efficacy of parachutes is weak and guideline recommendations for their use a…
RT @YarrowAngelweed: @BadWritingTakes “evidence supporting the efficacy of parachutes is weak and guideline recommendations for their use a…
@BadWritingTakes “evidence supporting the efficacy of parachutes is weak and guideline recommendations for their use are principally based on biological plausibility and expert opinion.” – https://t.co/reOr7JS1fB
RT @BellaRudd1: @ded_ruckus studies have shown https://t.co/Wdh6OI7LWE
@yacineMTB Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial https://t.co/QGxMCg0D6V
@ded_ruckus studies have shown https://t.co/Wdh6OI7LWE
@19joho The RCT about parachutes … a satirical study 😉 : https://t.co/qa4emjYgut
@dgurdasani1 💯 Excellent analogy! 🪂Reminds us of the RCT in @bmj_latest ⬇️ 🪂Study design matters ❗️ HT @Vilavaite #MedTwitter #epitwitter #AcademicTwitter #MedEd @PeoplesCDC @lzj961 @DrJudyStone @AWangMPH @EpiEllie @pjavidan @beansprouts_mom @laurieallee
@booyah2yah @paddleplr @LauriaultSteve @DickZoutman There is a tongue in cheek RCT of parachutes, and it's hilarious. https://t.co/jMliWcr0U2
RT @graeme_0: @DrJBhattacharya @RETsetLife we’re still doing this? https://t.co/34aqYQCQzh
@DrJBhattacharya @RETsetLife https://t.co/w8lueBE9oJ This RCT shows we know N95 masks are as effective at preventing COVID transmission as parachutes are at preventing fall deaths. Go science!
@BiffAndFinn @CaliperBrakes @JeromeAdamsMD @YakkStack Actually, a randomised study was published on parachutes. Displayed no superiority for survival. So few planes crash, handing them out to passengers shows no statistically significant gain https://t.co
RT @riley_whomst: @gorskon ... and for anyone looking for a larf, I *highly* recommend this study from BMJ: Smith GC, Pell JP. 2003. Para…
@gorskon ... and for anyone looking for a larf, I *highly* recommend this study from BMJ: Smith GC, Pell JP. 2003. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ.
@PEHJackson It actually helps to have him go to this absurd extreme. We should take serveral years to study each annual flu shot before distribution. I think he actually supports this https://t.co/KIksPOstBr
RT @DrElbourne: @chantz_y Parachutes don't help anyway, it was shown by a randomised controlled trial. https://t.co/y5Ut2nlIqR
@PeteUK7 @dgurdasani1 Don’t forget the parachutes! https://t.co/e4YrdkbujV
RT @DrElbourne: @chantz_y Parachutes don't help anyway, it was shown by a randomised controlled trial. https://t.co/y5Ut2nlIqR
@covidsafenetwrk @chantz_y According to this RCT, they are not.* *note: research ethics prevent testing the efficacy of parachutes under conditions where a parachute would make a difference. https://t.co/GwBzd2uWOu
@chantz_y Parachutes don't help anyway, it was shown by a randomised controlled trial. https://t.co/y5Ut2nlIqR
RT @semanthis: Jürgen hat verdammt noch mal recht!!! Zumindest hinsichtlich des Fallschirms! Es gibt Studien die zeigen, dass ein Fallschir…
Jürgen hat verdammt noch mal recht!!! Zumindest hinsichtlich des Fallschirms! Es gibt Studien die zeigen, dass ein Fallschirm ein falsches Gefühl von Sicherheit vermittelt und tatsächlich in den untersuchten Umständen gar keine Wirkung zeigt: https://t.co/
@Nota_Lemming @Johnincarlisle @YouTube As my initial article pointed out they aren't necessarily nor ethical. https://t.co/alJ37ajTkz
@djlange Parachutes don't work, either: https://t.co/FNYjhQInv9
@narkosepadawan @Timmx92 Bin auf RCUK LL inhaltlich eingegangen. Wenn ähnlich aktuelle LL zu selbem Thema abweichende Empfehlungen geben, dann könnte das bedeuten dass die Frage nicht binär zu beantworten ist. Nochmals: fehlende gute Studien bedeuten nicht
@raefneerg @stegwort23 @doc__s @CollignonPeter Respirators work: Last but not least, here is the paper explaining why randomized controlled trial do NOT work to evaluate these kind of things. Please, do not hesitate to ask if you have more questions! h
RT @salanaland: Niche satire is some of the best satire https://t.co/0gbvHRRWos
Niche satire is some of the best satire https://t.co/0gbvHRRWos
@sunsopeningband Sine qua non parachutis? I only know anatomical Latin. https://t.co/DdDC9MyG02
@TinoPfaff Schon auf hohem Niveau ist es leicht Ergebnisse zu fälschen. Bei Ihren Quellen ist es sogar Programm. https://t.co/c5GP55TySP.
@ben_geisler And the follow up! https://t.co/K0zbHEzQ6K
@MaxJordan_N There is a very important RCT that parachutes don’t help which is why I don’t recommend them https://t.co/K0zbHEzQ6K