| Title |
Models of Peer Support to Remediate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne McPeake, Eliotte L Hirshberg, Leeann M Christie, Kelly Drumright, Kimberley Haines, Catherine L Hough, Joel Meyer, Dorothy Wade, Adair Andrews, Rita Bakhru, Samantha Bates, John A Barwise, Julie Bastarache, Sarah J Beesley, Leanne M Boehm, Sheryl Brown, Alison S Clay, Penelope Firshman, Steven Greenberg, Wendy Harris, Christopher Hill, Carol Hodgson, Clare Holdsworth, Aluko A Hope, Ramona O Hopkins, David C J Howell, Anna Janssen, James C Jackson, Annie Johnson, Erin K Kross, Daniela Lamas, Belinda MacLeod-Smith, Ruth Mandel, John Marshall, Mark E Mikkelsen, Megan Nackino, Tara Quasim, Carla M Sevin, Andrew Slack, Rachel Spurr, Mary Still, Carol Thompson, Gerald Weinhouse, M Elizabeth Wilcox, Theodore J Iwashyna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 20% |
| Australia | 8 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 56% |
| Scientists | 21 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 76 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 83 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#565,452
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#212
of 9,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,582
of 449,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#6
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.