| Title |
2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jasmeet Soar, Michael W. Donnino, Ian Maconochie, Richard Aickin, Dianne L. Atkins, Lars W. Andersen, Katherine M. Berg, Robert Bingham, Bernd W. Böttiger, Clifton W. Callaway, Keith Couper, Thomaz Bittencourt Couto, Allan R. de Caen, Charles D. Deakin, Ian R. Drennan, Anne-Marie Guerguerian, Eric J. Lavonas, Peter A. Meaney, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Robert W. Neumar, Kee-Chong Ng, Tonia C. Nicholson, Gabrielle A. Nuthall, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Brian J. O’Neil, Gene Yong-Kwang Ong, Edison F. Paiva, Michael J. Parr, Amelia G. Reis, Joshua C. Reynolds, Giuseppe Ristagno, Claudio Sandroni, Stephen M. Schexnayder, Barnaby R. Scholefield, Naoki Shimizu, Janice A. Tijssen, Patrick Van de Voorde, Tzong-Luen Wang, Michelle Welsford, Mary Fran Hazinski, Jerry P. Nolan, Peter T. Morley, On behalf of the ILCOR Collaborators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 206 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 38 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 9% |
| Canada | 10 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 4% |
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| Italy | 6 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 156 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 13% |
| Scientists | 23 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 25% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#282,370
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#41
of 5,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,888
of 368,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#1
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.