31/J How about using scientific evidence to assess IPCC claims? The IPCC often underestimated climate trends, other than warming https://t.co/QwQ0OL3Z1g https://t.co/39iyJYYDqP [https://t.co/Kv1BPa72cG] https://t.co/AyfxsVdVKc https://t.co/4IdJTHJmeL [
@NiusMarco @ventnorhumphrie @TonyClimate And an assessment looking at 70+ studies from 1983 to 2018. There's quite a range of values for 2050 onwards, but not so much difference before. Where did you find yours? Circles below show count of studies by range
@barlow2021 @blewlinecd @ph2403 @PeterGleick None of these prediction’s were correct. https://t.co/cWpbtyklYj https://t.co/165oxyJYod
@barlow2021 @Black_Exxorcist @EdODonoghue4 @ph2403 @PeterGleick None of these predictions materialized. https://t.co/roT6mNGNMb https://t.co/9iZoogBa7Y
“In addition, results from this work indicate a tendency for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports to err on the side of least drama—a conservative bias that could potentially impede risk management.” We really don’t know where the Ice & s
RT @iceclimate: Programs like @GlacierThwaites and @ProtectSlr are a great start, but how do we increase the rate at which we constrain the…
RT @iceclimate: Programs like @GlacierThwaites and @ProtectSlr are a great start, but how do we increase the rate at which we constrain the…
RT @jeffgoodell: The contrast between how much is at stake w stability of West Antarctic ice sheet & how little money and attention we (ie,…
RT @Revkin: I'm a huge fan of polar and sea-level science. But I see zero odds science can catch up with this level of complexity in time t…
I'm a huge fan of polar and sea-level science. But I see zero odds science can catch up with this level of complexity in time to narrow CO2 or adaptation policy. #knownunknowable on relevant time scales. Opportunity cost leads to @profadamsobel's #usablesc
RT @jeffgoodell: The contrast between how much is at stake w stability of West Antarctic ice sheet & how little money and attention we (ie,…
RT @jeffgoodell: The contrast between how much is at stake w stability of West Antarctic ice sheet & how little money and attention we (ie,…
RT @jeffgoodell: The contrast between how much is at stake w stability of West Antarctic ice sheet & how little money and attention we (ie,…
The contrast between how much is at stake w stability of West Antarctic ice sheet & how little money and attention we (ie, the rich, science-friendly developed world) are willing to spend to understand what is actually going on with that ice sheet is,
Programs like @GlacierThwaites and @ProtectSlr are a great start, but how do we increase the rate at which we constrain these known processes faster than the rate at which we add new processes to the list of uncertainties (as @AndraJReed showed)?https://t.
@boshj My knowledge is focused narrowly on sea level rise, but this is a nice summary of the more recent projections: https://t.co/Rh4r6F6eJY Combine that with this tool from NOAA, and you can see what SLR looks like around the coast: https://t.co/XVQXlxe
@AGrinsted Thanks. I haven't looked at the Kopp et al 2016 paper in a while. I did find some info in Garner et al 2018. I like the idea of comparing SEMs to process-based + probabilistic approaches; I hope the research keeps up. Provide checks on each oth
RT @RogerPielkeJr: Even including RCP8.5 studies the IPCC assessments of SLR to 2100 have been remarkably consistent over decades Garner et…
So too has the underlying peer-reviewed research on SLR to 2100 (from excellent Garner et al 2019 https://t.co/PjwDIbbufv) Figures below Top= high emissions (eg RCP8.5) Center= middle emissions (eg RCP4.5) Bottom= low emissions (eg RCP2.6) Tan strip= IPC
Even including RCP8.5 studies the IPCC assessments of SLR to 2100 have been remarkably consistent over decades Garner et al 2019 https://t.co/PjwDIbbufv ) https://t.co/aVUIgXTRYa
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @MichaelEMann: Very proud academic dad here! 😊
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @MichaelEMann: Very proud academic dad here! 😊 https://t.co/K7aJbW2XNf
Very proud academic dad here! 😊
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
Congratulations Andra! https://t.co/bfhEPQXmo1
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
RT @AndraJReed: Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projec…
Received a pleasant surprise this morning when I learned that our article, "Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projections," was a #TopDownloadedArticle in @EarthsFutureEiC! @jeremylweiss @bobkopp @radleyhorton @GreatLakesPeck @SeaLevelNTU https://t.
@GregoryMakles @crentsch I don't think that's true. https://t.co/prp7YzZfzY And https://t.co/p77AV45wuW
Re: "[The IPCC] use less "alarmist" language [and] under-estimate climate change effects" More on that, including the IPCC admitting it: https://t.co/bTQeCPneRt https://t.co/gLIdo1a15C https://t.co/TZhlmRqu5g page 1-13 in section 1.4: https://t.co/PTxN
@AndraJReed a reconstitué l'historique de ces projections: en gros, depuis 1980, l'estimation la plus vraisemblable a peu changé (~80cm en 2100 pour de fortes émissions de gaz à effets de serre). Les scénarios dits "extrêmes"!, eux., ont beaucoup varié htt
RT @tan123: After nearly three decades of "worse than we thought" sea level hype, key guess is the same as it was in 1990. https://t.co/jUA…
Expert solicitation on expected sea level rise by 2100 shows numbers above #IPCC report #acdcsummerschool Is there a difference between paleo and modern perspective of scientists? @NatalyaGomezEPS https://t.co/C8akINqjMn https://t.co/V6M2Q2v43h
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projections https://t.co/Wz8jDigU8I #nuclear #uranium #thorium #repeal140A https://t.co/16sd72dVZs
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @HuslerLaurenz: Prognose 1990: maximal 1.1m Erhöhung des Meeresspiegels Prognose 2019: maximal 1.1m Erhöhung des Meeresspiegels Unters…
RT @tan123: After nearly three decades of "worse than we thought" sea level hype, key guess is the same as it was in 1990. https://t.co/jUA…
RT @tan123: After nearly three decades of "worse than we thought" sea level hype, key guess is the same as it was in 1990. https://t.co/jUA…
After nearly three decades of "worse than we thought" sea level hype, key guess is the same as it was in 1990.
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
@DamoPelham @drwaheeduddin @JWSpry Well, on the same level as 30 years ago. Just louder, much louder. https://t.co/IsvT2FeyJK
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
@s_sommaruga @IPCC_CH Vorhersage 1990: 1,1m Vorhersage 2019: 1,1m Unterschied: Die Lautstärke des Geschreis. https://t.co/IsvT2FeyJK
Prognose 1990: maximal 1.1m Erhöhung des Meeresspiegels Prognose 2019: maximal 1.1m Erhöhung des Meeresspiegels Unterschied: Null. Unterschied Geschrei: 1000dB
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
1.1m is same extreme of a range the IPCC prophesied in 1990. c.30cm of it should have occurred already, if correct. Actual satellite observation is 2-3mm per decade = c.1cm in 30yrs, < 1/30 IPCC's unlikely extreme prediction. IPCC models are just wrong
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT RogerPielkeJr: Fun fact Most extreme 2100 sea level rise scenario of 1990 IPCC report= 1.1m https://t.co/kWTNgBN1Og Most extreme 2100 sea level rise scenario of 2019 IPCC report= 1.1m https://t.co/ktmukD00h7 Over 3 decades projections of SLR for 2100 f
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @ockhams: In 1990 was de extreemste voorspelling van het IPCC over zeespiegelstijging, dat het tegen 2100 misschien 1,1m zou kunnen zijn…
RT @lbergkamp: Sea level rise hysteria is not supported by science. This is the most extreme scenario, unlikely to happen. Scenarios are n…