| Title |
Survivorship, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0078 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Crystal S Denlinger, Tara Sanft, K Scott Baker, Gregory Broderick, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Debra L Friedman, Mindy Goldman, Melissa Hudson, Nazanin Khakpour, Allison King, Divya Koura, Robin M Lally, Terry S Langbaum, Allison L McDonough, Michelle Melisko, Jose G Montoya, Kathi Mooney, Javid J Moslehi, Tracey O'Connor, Linda Overholser, Electra D Paskett, Jeffrey Peppercorn, William Pirl, M Alma Rodriguez, Kathryn J Ruddy, Paula Silverman, Sophia Smith, Karen L Syrjala, Amye Tevaarwerk, Susan G Urba, Mark T Wakabayashi, Phyllis Zee, Nicole R McMillian, Deborah A Freedman-Cass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 28% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,180,541
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#166
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,218
of 360,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.