@SarahTheHaider Sure. I think the problem arises when your argument relies on criticizing unnamed activists and non-specific negative impacts. I'd say the core benefit is that Crenshaw's basic framework is accurate and more people are attuned to it now.
@ZenaMOBrienB @BanishedBernie now I'm going to start... https://t.co/eCvk6ioI7u
@JeremiahAlbers @RatherReadABook @thomaschattwill @wesyang Not sure I understand your question. Here's some quantitative research on the "double disadvantage" hypothesis derived from Crenshaw's work: https://t.co/cgYE5Syc4o https://t.co/0pGAsCp83J https:/
@JeremiahAlbers @RatherReadABook @thomaschattwill @wesyang What is "it" here? Crenshaw isn't really a scientist, but her claims about the role of intersectionality in employment discrimination were based on real cases, and subsequent quantitative research
@TylerJoeDurden @jeffrey_metcalf @culturayevol @SwipeWright "Multiple Disadvantages: An Empirical Test of Intersectionality Theory in EEO Litigation" https://t.co/tGHknOXu2D
Here you go http://t.co/diCdXXZseK and http://t.co/Tq8W81Sz8M @Merica_Rulz
Prof Edelman says plaintiffs who claim discrimination on 2 counts (sex & race) r only 1/2 as likely to win vs 1 count. http://t.co/8xOXV1sp