↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Multiple Disadvantages: An Empirical Test of Intersectionality Theory in EEO Litigation

Overview of attention for article published in Law & Society Review, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 441)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Multiple Disadvantages: An Empirical Test of Intersectionality Theory in EEO Litigation
Published in
Law & Society Review, December 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00463.x
Authors

Rachel Kahn Best, Lauren B. Edelman, Linda Hamilton Krieger, Scott R. Eliason

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 38%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Professor 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 63 67%
Psychology 18 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 6 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#102,836
of 14,570,924 outputs
Outputs from Law & Society Review
#2
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#746
of 209,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law & Society Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,570,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them