| Title |
How Does Feeling Informed Relate to Being Informed? The DECISIONS Survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Decision Making, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0272989x10379647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen R Sepucha, Angela Fagerlin, Mick P Couper, Carrie A Levin, Eleanor Singer, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 221 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 70 | 32% |
| United States | 17 | 8% |
| Australia | 10 | 5% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 73 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 123 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 49 | 22% |
| Scientists | 42 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Psychology | 16 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#320,174
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Medical Decision Making
#11
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#821
of 108,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Decision Making
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.