@q2_fah50130 @maxfawcett Peer reviewed research study published in an accredited scientific journal. That you call that biased & inaccurate doesn't actually discredit the finding, it discredits yourself. https://t.co/itefmdo4CL
Karbonavgift?
@RosendahlKE Med en slik tankegang skal isåfall Saudi-Arabia tømmes før Norge skrur igjen krana da, eller - ifølge norsk oljepolitikk? Saudi-Arabisk olje er mindre "lavkarbonintensiv" enn norsk olje @oeddep @Equinor https://t.co/RZe6t5krSF
RT @emi_eaton: The study is behind a paywall, but you can download a copy here: https://t.co/vZsmVjC095
@AaronCosbey Or here’s a direct link https://t.co/ClDSE5RBli
@AaronCosbey Certainly -
RT @emi_eaton: The study is behind a paywall, but you can download a copy here: https://t.co/vZsmVjC095
The study is behind a paywall, but you can download a copy here: https://t.co/vZsmVjC095
@saskboy @SustainableSK The study is behind a paywall, but you can download a copy here: https://t.co/vZsmVjC095
RT @emi_eaton: It is based on this 2018 study in Science (unfortunately not open access): https://t.co/ClDSE5RBli Which was reported on in…
RT @emi_eaton: It is based on this 2018 study in Science (unfortunately not open access): https://t.co/ClDSE5RBli Which was reported on in…
@MickaCorreia Wow wow wow, vous dites que la France IMPORTE son pétrole? De pays qui en PRODUISENT? Les scoops chez mediapart dis donc, c’est d’un autre niveau. Et quitte à en importer, autant le faire là ou il est le moins « carboné ». https://t.co/LuaZzs
Here’s a link to a study ranking Canada as having a higher emissions intensity than Nigeria which includes a chart that I have seen used to support the position taken by the Canadian Federal government. https://t.co/Nj3F7oS2fa. https://t.co/lEiPtMhC5l
The Alberta govt tells everyone that our oil is "cleaner" that almost all other oil around the world. Not true. Of 50 world producers, we're almost the worst. Read the scientific findings: https://t.co/se99xfW0xp https://t.co/7PTlWYMRmM
@Nord_Mann @UweRGGaertner @ChrisGeyer7 @KarlMichiels @DiedrichLeander @faznet Um genau zu sein, liegt beim Diesel die Emission von Quelle über Produktion bis Verbrennung bei bei 3.14 kg CO². 76%davon entstehen, eh der Diesel überhaupt im Fahrzeug verbrann
RT @NiddamDent: According to this 2018 study, Canadian crude oil production is the 4th most carbon-intensive in the world. https://t.co/weZ…
RT @NiddamDent: According to this 2018 study, Canadian crude oil production is the 4th most carbon-intensive in the world. https://t.co/weZ…
According to this 2018 study, Canadian crude oil production is the 4th most carbon-intensive in the world. https://t.co/weZhCfo6UQ
@hildrup https://t.co/EMLfWCmUPx I tillegg vil den negative effekten av forbrenning overgå klimakutt i produksjonsleddet, så lenge vi fortsetter å åpne nye oljefelt.
@WinstonV99 Thanks Winston -- there actually are estimates of it, like from this paper. However, a lot of the difference here is due to crude oil type, like you see Canada and Venezuela are bad on emissions intensity because they produce heavy oil. https:/
@thevivafrei @ABDanielleSmith @RachelNotley Venezuela crude higher CO2 footprint than Canadian crude: https://t.co/uOULf6E68E Effects of fertilizer constraints as proposed by Liberal government: https://t.co/IrP8G5fmOY Coal use in US related to NatGas pric
@livetefterfire @bjrrn1 @leoerlandsson @RolfPersson11 Kanske inte står i exakt siffror. Dock gör det det här. Kortfattat kan man lägga till 30% på bensin och 24% för diesel när det kommer till CO2-utsläpp om man tar med produktionen i beräkningen. https:/
@e_stonewell @DerGraslutscher Guter Punkt. Da kämen für Verbrenner eigentlich nochmal 15%-40% CO2-Emissionen dazu. Das macht die Heuchelei in der Behandlung von (e)Autos und Bitcoin-Mining noch größer. https://t.co/Vb9W8v5Iuz
It is based on this 2018 study in Science (unfortunately not open access): https://t.co/ClDSE5RBli Which was reported on in this @CanadianPress piece published by @CBCNews : https://t.co/ldHdx9D9aY
RT @DerGraslutscher: ... bitte ein E-Auto schlagen? Diesel materialisiert nicht in der Zapfsäule, je nach Herkunft des Öls ist das richtig…
RT @DerGraslutscher: ... bitte ein E-Auto schlagen? Diesel materialisiert nicht in der Zapfsäule, je nach Herkunft des Öls ist das richtig…
RT @DerGraslutscher: ... bitte ein E-Auto schlagen? Diesel materialisiert nicht in der Zapfsäule, je nach Herkunft des Öls ist das richtig…
... bitte ein E-Auto schlagen? Diesel materialisiert nicht in der Zapfsäule, je nach Herkunft des Öls ist das richtig energieintensiv (Bei Ölsanden liegen wir deutlich über 4kg CO2 / Liter, Quelle: https://t.co/4dh7qkVMY2) Aber selbst bei 3,2 kg CO2 ist
@RyanGassn @ikwilson https://t.co/A27uOHAzrY Masnadi.
@traehe00 @Nickni Das ist viel zu wenig, die Benzinproduktion wird immer aufwändiger und erhöht die Emissionen der Verbrennung je nach Öl-Fördermethode um 25 bis 45 Prozent. https://t.co/V3c9TZoJgr
RT @DerGraslutscher: Bei der Herstellung von Benzin und Diesel sind ebenfalls große Maschinen beteiligt, die eine Menge Erdöl und Erdgas ve…
RT @DerGraslutscher: Bei der Herstellung von Benzin und Diesel sind ebenfalls große Maschinen beteiligt, die eine Menge Erdöl und Erdgas ve…
Bei der Herstellung von Benzin und Diesel sind ebenfalls große Maschinen beteiligt, die eine Menge Erdöl und Erdgas verbrennen, bis das Zeug aus dem Zapfhahn sprudelt. Schätzungen gehen von ø 25% aus, also einem viertel Liter Erdöl pro Liter Kraftstoff. ht
@j_velecky @tina_ad_ Ve skutečnosti asi víc: +17 % = +~7 CO₂eq./MJ (Well-to-Refinery, Polsko, bez Uralu to bude značně víc; světový průměr 10,3) [1] + 5,3 CO₂eq./MJ (rafinace na naftu v "EU rafinerii") [2] V tom chybí doprava produktu 1: https://t.co/wmT8P
@FordCorsair @PaulCowland_ Just a couple https://t.co/iEdGz8vx2e https://t.co/NWt3g0aZ99 put cars in and it works out total life cycle costs and emissions https://t.co/UWUSlHZPm3 how much CO2 is produced just getting petrol in your car before you even bu
Affordable technologies & best practice can mitigate Scope 1 & 2 emissions, setting their oil/gas at the low end of emissions intensity per barrel, & @ lowest end depending on the geology.https://t.co/Re13xKGfS5 Doing so should make their proj
@PRingholm Norge havner utenfor pallplass ifølge denne oversikten https://t.co/ZwSxkBzrew
RT @AukeHoekstra: TR;DR: we always knew that diesel and gasoline didn't simply rain down into your tank but new studies show that more CO2…
@dr_larcher @Nord_Mann @TTichelofen Abgesehen vom Energieaufwand wird auch gerne übersehen, dass die Produktion der Treibstoffe auch schon heftig CO2 erzeugt. https://t.co/Vv20er8Hu8
@samuelbrasch Best I could find was this which says US crude oil production has slightly higher carbon emissions per unit energy produced than the global average. https://t.co/ekS02G2I3n
@janihau77 Tästä. Öljylähteestä ja jalostuksesta riippuen 15-40%. Koomey ja kollegat ovat tehneet Oil Climate Indexin. Löytyy Carnegien sivuilta. https://t.co/W0q9q1aFon
@MaxFichtner @Naturschuetzen @AukeHoekstra und darin wird auf folgendes referenziert: https://t.co/viJ1tNeBkJ
@ulfaronsson1 Det är en kombination av dessa två: https://t.co/LvrWFyk35L https://t.co/aMiirsX5ys Samt denna: https://t.co/07nE8fBpIv "Producing, transporting, and refining crude oil into fuels such as gasoline and diesel accounts for ∼15 to 40% of the “w
@new_dominick @jkenney Here is the study: https://t.co/M8MLQfu2KO
@BlairKing_ca @ngottliebphoto @globeandmail @CDN_Dimension Are you sure? This Science article has a whole paragraph on their methodology wrt flaring measurement, and still puts Canada near the top (as of 2015)... https://t.co/wHyAhH2eX4 https://t.co/LXuQnX
RT @AukeHoekstra: TR;DR: we always knew that diesel and gasoline didn't simply rain down into your tank but new studies show that more CO2…
@UweRGGaertner Hallo Hr. Prof. Gärtner, in Science gab es mal eine Auswertung, nach der dem Ausstoß im Fahrbetrieb beim Diesel ca. 25% (Benziner höher) für die W2W-Betrachtung zugeschlagen werden müssen. Passt das? https://t.co/1jNHPm5Pj4
@benfields144 @Golden_dad1 @GadSaad @JoeBiden Politics aside Saudi Arabia has one of the cleanest oil extraction operations in terms of carbon emissions while Canada has one of the dirtiest. This is because a majority of Saudi's reserves is light crude whi
@UweRGGaertner @haagfdp @goll_julia 2 ältere Studien finden leicht neg. Effekt - die große Mehrheit dagegen positive --> qed. Und das obwohl 1. teilw. ein stat. Strommix unterstellt bzw. 2. Sekundäremissionen bei der Kraftstoffproduktion (Well to tank +
@todd_tremble @ABDanielleSmith You are kidding right? This is not new information. Canadian oil is in the higher end of the list for emissions. We are working hard to improve that but the data is pretty clear https://t.co/blc7TdBgi8
@DildoSchwagins_ @ABDanielleSmith Here ya go...only a peer reviewed report in the biggest journal on the planet https://t.co/blc7TdBgi8
RT @ClimateDuncan: @ABDanielleSmith Oil sands are not the cleanest. Here's a chart from Mohammad S. Masnadi et al., “Global Carbon Intensi…
RT @ClimateDuncan: @ABDanielleSmith Oil sands are not the cleanest. Here's a chart from Mohammad S. Masnadi et al., “Global Carbon Intensi…
@ABDanielleSmith Oil sands are not the cleanest. Here's a chart from Mohammad S. Masnadi et al., “Global Carbon Intensity of Crude Oil Production,” Science 361, no. 6405 (August 31, 2018): 851–53, https://t.co/qm25inycRS. It shows Canada as the fourth mos
@JoeCalnan I'm sure ESG was part of the consideration but we shouldn't also discount the significant emissions differential between oil sands and other resources. In this case, it might a meaningful reduction in emissions. https://t.co/xZcBR4eyfZ
@Mr_Forbes02 @CharlesEMcIvor @isabelleboemeke Wanted to add that oil refining into gas or diesel also add another 15-40% CO2 to the cycle (https://t.co/oFAKFv4vCX) which I havent seen you take into account anywhere. I never said that coal powered EC could
@gruenewege @UweRGGaertner Korrekt pro KM. Basis sind 530g CO2e/Kg Diesel und damit über dem globalen Mittel veranschlagt: https://t.co/Y0BZtpQrp8 Leider scheinen Sie nur ihre unfundierte Meinung wiedergeben zu wollen ohne Sachlich beizutragen. Viel Erfol
@RosendahlKE @gbx3X4npJziJj0y @AKvellestad Sånn rent bortsett fra at Saudia-Arabia har mindre CO2-intensiv oljeproduksjon enn Norge, da. https://t.co/hpSf97CkSg
@Amelia4Utah @woundedbear @RobertGehrke From https://t.co/NO6ZU5eWV0 Carbon intensity of US oil production is pretty close to the global average. Combustion of gasoline generates about 7x as much emissions as production, refining, and transport. https://t.
RT @AukeHoekstra: TR;DR: we always knew that diesel and gasoline didn't simply rain down into your tank but new studies show that more CO2…
2) Plastic, in order to be made at all, needs oil. Oil, both from intial drilling and refining, is incredibly polluting. You want to cut CO2? Cut oil substances. Oil fields alone made 1.7 gigatonnes of CO2 in 2015. That's just the surface of that iceberg.
For the record, academic research found that Canada's crude oil is the 4th dirtiest out of 50 producing countries. #cdnpoli https://t.co/WfNmNwud3L
@MMandryk Thanks for keeping this out there for the world to see about our complacency. Canada is 4th in the world for emissions intensity for oil and gas from extraction to refining. https://t.co/25LX9p5uD5
@AHiddyCBC I think this article suggests Canada is 4th in the world for Emmisions Intensity when looking at well to refinery of crude oil. https://t.co/25LX9p5uD5
@Steve_Byra @mdgardiner1 @PierrePoilievre @CPC_HQ Peer reviewed scientific research: Canada's oil production is the 47th cleanest in the world You: "I've already made it perfectly clear that I reject any and all peer reviewed scientific evidence that cont
@maxfawcett @Devgru6G "If we end all of Canada's oil production, what do you think happens?" Since the fossil fuels Canada exports are the 47th cleanest on the planet, the remainder of the oil on global markets becomes incrementally cleaner, with a lower
@Feynman_19 @sohaibab9 @WhiteTundraSG Out of 50 oil producing nations, 46 of them produce hydrocarbons that are cleaner than Alberta’s. Stop shilling for climate apocalypse. Peer reviewed research here: https://t.co/itefmdnwNd
@maxfawcett Out of 50 oil producing nations, 46 of them produce hydrocarbons that are cleaner than Alberta’s. https://t.co/itefmdnwNd
RT @AukeHoekstra: TR;DR: we always knew that diesel and gasoline didn't simply rain down into your tank but new studies show that more CO2…
@wawryko15 @PierrePoilievre Nothing in that that is in disagreement with the two points made in my tweet. China's 5%ownership. GHGs produced in oil sands is on the same scale as Venezuela. See below https://t.co/fV8ZzTU209
@PierrePoilievre Sorry - did you mean to say "fourth most GHG-intensive oil in the world"? https://t.co/2pO6LhyfqL
@shoysniemi Tässä carbon intensity upstream https://t.co/I7HM6FpVd0 Ja tässä arvioitu mitä tapahtuu marginaalissa, kun kulutus vähennee https://t.co/8vbpEoav3w
@dwdavidson841 @sunlorrie Someone is smoking something! Canada's oil production emissions are the 4th highest in the world per MJ of energy produced. Source: https://t.co/5hlJaZuLpW Oil Sands tailing ponds still lack an economical method of filtration fo
@liverational22 @HeatherMoAndCo @norargh1 Masnadi et al. 2018 In case you were looking for a citation for that remark. https://t.co/IR7Kx8scrZ
RT @mhmiranusa: Oil field carbon intensity (CI) of the world. CI is a measure of greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing crude o…
RT @mhmiranusa: Oil field carbon intensity (CI) of the world. CI is a measure of greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing crude o…
RT @mhmiranusa: Oil field carbon intensity (CI) of the world. CI is a measure of greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing crude o…
Oil field carbon intensity (CI) of the world. CI is a measure of greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing crude oil from the well to refinery gate. Worst: Algeria, Venezuela, Cameroon, Canada, Iran. Best: Denmark, Saudi, Bahrain, Thailand, Ghana.
@ICannot_Enough It's been a few years since I read it. Did you dig into the study itself in Science? https://t.co/9SvdcByKPd
@dalhousiemooch @JJ_McCullough Page 8 of this is a good place to start: https://t.co/1i91Vhtm1u As for coal, ng, and other non-legacy sources, like wind, solar, etc. the tide is turning and the legacy sources are becoming comparatively more expensive to im
Lol. If Canada disappeared tomorrow, the net effect on the world would be negligible.
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
@shirleyturnbull Dig in. https://t.co/gImQhudmw0 You may also want to read this one. https://t.co/fAYWCY2oo9
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
This is why I love Twitter. One reason anyways. Kyle always breaks down the rhetoric and gives me facts I can get behind cuz I understand. So many of you out there do great things everyday and I hope you know that. Anyways...🌺
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
RT @DrKyle: Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that…
Lying with statistics. **Production** emissions are only 5% of the total emissions produced by burning oil & gas. Dropping that 5% by 25% gets us to 98.75%. Many places in the world will be ravaged by climate change if we only do 1.25% of the 100% need
@RogerHa01898747 @Vi_stemmer_INP @Lan_Marie Merkelig hvordan du kun spør om bevis fra meg, og ikke personen som originalt kom med påstanden. Men jaja, vær så god: https://t.co/fJpzJJiyRk https://t.co/EBHdpGb2tz
@VeinVigri @TheGoodOldWheel @peoplespca @MaximeBernier Impressive you can be wrong about so many things in one tweet, but start with the fact that tar sands produce many times more kg of CO2 per barrel than average and that sadly enough Saudi’s Arabia has