| Title |
US Diagnosis of UCL Tears of the Thumb and Stener Lesions: Technique, Pattern-based Approach, and Differential Diagnosis1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
RadioGraphics, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1148/rg.264055117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Farhad S Ebrahim, Michel De Maeseneer, Tjeerd Jager, Stefaan Marcelis, David A Jamadar, Jon A Jacobson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 44% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 73% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,025,728
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from RadioGraphics
#765
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,324
of 88,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RadioGraphics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.