| Title |
Characteristics of healthcare organisations struggling to improve quality: results from a systematic review of qualitative studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007573 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerie M Vaughn, Sanjay Saint, Sarah L Krein, Jane H Forman, Jennifer Meddings, Jessica Ameling, Suzanne Winter, Whitney Townsend, Vineet Chopra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 428 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 98 | 23% |
| United States | 56 | 13% |
| Canada | 49 | 11% |
| Spain | 16 | 4% |
| Australia | 12 | 3% |
| Ireland | 11 | 3% |
| South Africa | 8 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 5 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Unknown | 142 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 267 | 62% |
| Scientists | 78 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 75 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 449 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 7% |
| Researcher | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 106 | 24% |
| Unknown | 143 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 36 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 6% |
| Psychology | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 13% |
| Unknown | 158 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#124,935
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#38
of 2,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,501
of 342,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.