↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
821 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
Title
Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1423041112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cody E. Hinchliff, Stephen A. Smith, James F. Allman, J. Gordon Burleigh, Ruchi Chaudhary, Lyndon M. Coghill, Keith A. Crandall, Jiabin Deng, Bryan T. Drew, Romina Gazis, Karl Gude, David S. Hibbett, Laura A. Katz, H. Dail Laughinghouse IV, Emily Jane McTavish, Peter E. Midford, Christopher L. Owen, Richard H. Ree, Jonathan A. Rees, Douglas E. Soltis, Tiffani Williams, Karen A. Cranston, H. Dail Laughinghouse

Abstract

Reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships that unite all lineages (the tree of life) is a grand challenge. The paucity of homologous character data across disparately related lineages currently renders direct phylogenetic inference untenable. To reconstruct a comprehensive tree of life, we therefore synthesized published phylogenies, together with taxonomic classifications for taxa never incorporated into a phylogeny. We present a draft tree containing 2.3 million tips-the Open Tree of Life. Realization of this tree required the assembly of two additional community resources: (i) a comprehensive global reference taxonomy and (ii) a database of published phylogenetic trees mapped to this taxonomy. Our open source framework facilitates community comment and contribution, enabling the tree to be continuously updated when new phylogenetic and taxonomic data become digitally available. Although data coverage and phylogenetic conflict across the Open Tree of Life illuminate gaps in both the underlying data available for phylogenetic reconstruction and the publication of trees as digital objects, the tree provides a compelling starting point for community contribution. This comprehensive tree will fuel fundamental research on the nature of biological diversity, ultimately providing up-to-date phylogenies for downstream applications in comparative biology, ecology, conservation biology, climate change, agriculture, and genomics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 952 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 821 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 36 4%
Brazil 11 1%
Germany 9 1%
France 9 1%
Canada 8 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Mexico 7 <1%
Sweden 5 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Other 52 6%
Unknown 672 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 190 23%
Researcher 183 22%
Student > Master 124 15%
Student > Bachelor 84 10%
Professor 58 7%
Other 182 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 536 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 8%
Environmental Science 54 7%
Unspecified 44 5%
Computer Science 32 4%
Other 86 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,760
of 11,628,520 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#67
of 75,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53
of 241,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4
of 945 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,628,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 945 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.