↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Odds Ratios—Current Best Practice and Use

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
Odds Ratios—Current Best Practice and Use
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2018
DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.6971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward C. Norton, Bryan E. Dowd, Matthew L. Maciejewski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,233 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 249 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 18%
Other 37 15%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 61 24%
Unknown 30 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 40%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Psychology 11 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 61 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 759. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,165
of 17,443,211 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#414
of 29,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#401
of 283,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,443,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.