↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Odds Ratios—Current Best Practice and Use

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Odds Ratios—Current Best Practice and Use
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2018
DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.6971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward C. Norton, Bryan E. Dowd, Matthew L. Maciejewski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,246 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 21%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Unspecified 8 8%
Other 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 52%
Unspecified 23 22%
Psychology 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 809. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,398
of 12,698,348 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#165
of 25,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318
of 273,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,698,348 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.