↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Odds Ratios—Current Best Practice and Use

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Odds Ratios—Current Best Practice and Use
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2018
DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.6971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward C. Norton, Bryan E. Dowd, Matthew L. Maciejewski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,201 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 20%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 59%
Unspecified 14 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 11 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 787. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,109
of 12,135,286 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#156
of 24,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316
of 245,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,135,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.