@Gude__Wie @RonaiChaker Dazu gibt es sehr gute Studien, ich verlinke mal eine relevante: https://t.co/Y9vrZjm00l
RT @NoahCarl90: Doing research on the genetics of disease is EXTREMELY immoral. Yes, it might help us understand disease, but if we found g…
RT @NoahCarl90: Doing research on the genetics of disease is EXTREMELY immoral. Yes, it might help us understand disease, but if we found g…
RT @NoahCarl90: Doing research on the genetics of disease is EXTREMELY immoral. Yes, it might help us understand disease, but if we found g…
RT @NoahCarl90: Doing research on the genetics of disease is EXTREMELY immoral. Yes, it might help us understand disease, but if we found g…
Doing research on the genetics of disease is EXTREMELY immoral. Yes, it might help us understand disease, but if we found group differences in the distribution of genes it would imply some groups are GENETICALLY INFERIOR.
RT @NoahCarl90: This paper published in Nature Genetics in 2018 claims to identify loci associated with individual differences in intellige…
Explique Vd su prejuicio, por qué considera que es superior el más inteligente.
RT @NoahCarl90: This paper published in Nature Genetics in 2018 claims to identify loci associated with individual differences in intellige…
RT @NoahCarl90: This paper published in Nature Genetics in 2018 claims to identify loci associated with individual differences in intellige…
@ziltoid1991 @yes_12345678 @LeftAccidental Retard. These genes do exist https://t.co/U5XNGtxJEV And nobody is arguing you can't damage somebody's brain and make them stupider. However, for some people their max is 85IQ and for others it's 115. Completely d
RT @NoahCarl90: This paper published in Nature Genetics in 2018 claims to identify loci associated with individual differences in intellige…
RT @NoahCarl90: This paper published in Nature Genetics in 2018 claims to identify loci associated with individual differences in intellige…
This paper published in Nature Genetics in 2018 claims to identify loci associated with individual differences in intelligence. They're literally saying that some individuals are GENETICALLY INFERIOR to others. https://t.co/esRdFSVPLZ
@Co08621038Cox @siegemeister675 @whstancil Respectfully, there’s really no reasonable doubt that individual IQ is genetic to a significant extent. In fact, scientists *have* found hundreds of specific genes statistically correlated with IQ. But even before
@JuanQui43860705 @VilaWeb El debat és si és un problema cultural o genètic. Perquè si és genètic més pressupost serà llençar diners. https://t.co/4iKUr6dfks
@BKnightwell @BronNano26197 @TrollinNYC @codesfast @uMarhobane There are many (146+) genes that affect intelligence: https://t.co/8laFcmRB6m But there are 2 caveats with that: 1 - in total, those only explain 5.2% of IQ variance. 2 - (as you said) that ha
@A988986 @JeanReinfort @Russwarne Et pour finir, la première étude se base notamment sur une étude de 2018 publiée dans l'une des revues les plus prestigieuses du monde, "Nature Genetics". Rien que ça. https://t.co/GKB0Ct0JOn https://t.co/t7TEG2Ak2M
@NaptaLionblanc @JulioFreire76 @PlumpyLady @astropierre et bin au temps pour moi, y'a une partie héritable de l'intelligence quelle tragédie, et quel danger en plus https://t.co/dhtvPOddHL
@GillesDeleuze17 @GratiaP48821 Tamam ama eğer okullardan bahsediyorsak bizi ilgilendiren çocuklar değil mi? Bir de bu tek bir çalışma. Ben bütün literatürü bilmiyorum ama şu meta-analizde biraz farklı anlatıyor sanki? https://t.co/Z1o4hGpvxg https://t.co/
https://t.co/5ZDHdOAoQ2 https://t.co/IYQokSKRZI https://t.co/fGJULMkvgG https://t.co/AH1w4exlVB 美術に使えるのかは不明だけど、人間ってそういうものだよな、と思える論文が俺は好きです
@WeiyuanOttawa 上么是基因组测序好不好?是你不理解还是我不理解? https://t.co/j1EeeYzUBj
@WeiyuanOttawa 他们的批评说是实验control不够,所以不能得出结论对吧,我说的也是不能得出结论,而您的文章确定的是没有影响。您说的是福林说的是双胞胎实验不能证明有影响,但是你文章的结论是没有影响,这不就是非此即彼么? 基因相关的研究太多了。 https://t.co/j1EeeYzUBj
@WeiyuanOttawa Shenk和Chomsky说的point都是环境可能影响某性状,我从来没有否认这点。但是这不等于基因不影响这个性状。这就是我说的你逻辑上的非此即彼。分子生物学上的物理证据基本也是越来愈清晰的。https://t.co/j1EeeYzUBj
@SecretBaboon @SashaGusevPosts @EvoRoseman @monitoringbias @EvolOdonata @charlesmurray @jacobin @AlexTISYoung really don’t know what you’re basing any of this on. gwas for “cog” has turned up plenty of hits eg. https://t.co/uhvFWgUAB1
https://t.co/QjXWE5aWlC https://t.co/NVcRFY0hFo https://t.co/Y6plk6Nm4H すまねえ しにくいわけではないかも 知能や脳の働きが遺伝する可能性はある
@TheWalkerLane @LittleMammith @VoterScumbag @EAlluia @whstancil Like most traits, intelligence is highly polygenic.This serves as evidence that genes associated with intelligence have been identified: https://t.co/ShxVj9sscE
@Univers_Alex_ @cortisquared Yes y’a combinaison gènes et éducation. Je ne dirais pas qu’on n’en sait rien justement. Les gènes expliquent une partie de l’intelligence. Je viens de retomber sur cet article aussi https://t.co/6EF0tJqbvJ
Les gènes qui influencent l'intelligence influencent également d'autres traits et résultats. https://t.co/Fay1lGDjE6
@rubenarslan @davidhughjones I'm happy to be corrected with a higher SNP-h2 estimate, the flagship GWAS of intelligence (https://t.co/SJw184uD1a) has an even lower one: https://t.co/NjpgHygp8z
@MushroomGuy55 @EPHenricus @ObiWanKenobi_P1 @UsulduFutur Sans la source ce n'est pas très sérieux. On ne sait ni si c'est un papier scientifique, ni s'il est solide/cité, ni l'année. C'est comme ça qu'on fait : https://t.co/NamYdwkKWe https://t.co/BONBcxk
@luix Not one gene is linked to intelligence, rather it is the combination of multiple genes + your environment which set your intelligence GWAS studies have found links between genetics and intelligence https://t.co/5Xmz1Wc3Sb Any data for the Nigerian
@orpheno_ @Psyhodelikus Sur le caractère héréditaire de l'intelligence : https://t.co/uocVW3OgzN Egalement sur son caractère héréditaire : 24 variations génomiques influant l'intelligence découvertes https://t.co/NamYdwliLM
You’re just a liar. Genes impacting intelligence are being found all the time. https://t.co/8Wkwquwj8N
RT @6yhsdsiswmcd: @darkneco100 例えば2018年に発表されたこちらの調査では、約27万人のゲノムデータの分析(GWAS)により、知能に関連する1016個の遺伝子を特定しています。 https://t.co/GcnM7Qt4Rg
@darkneco100 例えば2018年に発表されたこちらの調査では、約27万人のゲノムデータの分析(GWAS)により、知能に関連する1016個の遺伝子を特定しています。 https://t.co/GcnM7Qt4Rg
Une grande partie des influences génétiques sous-jacentes au QI ne sont pas propres au QI. Une étude sur l'estimation du chevauchement entre les gènes associés au QI et un certain nombre d'autres caractéristiques (rg = corrélation génétique). https://t.
@logic_logos @monitoringbias 2) “…we present a large-scale genetic association study of intelligence (n = 269,867), identifying 205 associated genomic loci (190 new) and 1,016 genes (939 new)…” https://t.co/QIeNWxiZsK
Les gènes qui influencent l'intelligence influencent également d'autres traits et résultats. https://t.co/Fay1lGDjE6
Which of these snp have been shown to be causal FOR IQ? Never mind variance under benefit of doubt explains very little particularly within family. Its been more than 4 years. Anyone? Did they replicate even in subsequent studies?
@SecretBaboon @DeusIsChristos @FischerWerkat @DialecticBio There are some. The debate remains tho https://t.co/pmdbnKBEJo
@MTFrance @TurboNihilisme @YkarioTwitch Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence https://t.co/JrtLFMGbyA
https://t.co/jmm5hzf5tm tercümesi "şapı kaynatırsan olur mu şeker, cinsini sktiğim cinsine çeker".
@hamo17486497 @pasdecerveau12 @mbappinh0 @DamienRieu Et la part environementale de l'intelligence existe mais elle est surestimée par les gens. On va sur du + de 50% d'inné selon les chercheurs. https://t.co/xMXE52wgOA https://t.co/JrtLFMGbyA
@Pheldwyn @fancraft123 @ActuFoot_ Héritabilité du QI : https://t.co/cXTGdS1jj4 https://t.co/kZzqNd7GeV https://t.co/SfjQYAQXmp
@slimane18967139 @starmaxblue @deltadusud @J_Bardella On semble se diriger vers un consensus autour d'une forte héritabilité. https://t.co/w3ulTCLXfV https://t.co/xMXE52vIZ2 https://t.co/JrtLFMFDJ2
@drdevangm @cshperspectives @brembs This one is just as bad, only difference is that the authors didn’t go on a racist tirade on Twitter. https://t.co/JmjrdJ1i5W
@Fact @JaneEve3123 The new genetics of intelligence https://t.co/EKuP36AKHY Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence https://t.co/cMwBhFTIC2 @NatureGenet
@IronEconomist @rfitz77 @gabriel_mathy I don't think the research actually finds genes associated with high IQ are also associated with ADHD
General fitness level, and this is to be expected in light of evolutionary selection
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The same genes that influence intelligence also influence other traits and outcomes. "We confirm previous strong genetic…
RT @DanGraur: One more reason to regard all IQ/GWAS studies as very expensive pseudo-profound bullshit. https://t.co/326ZpvGBER
As noted by @JedMSP, 65% of the twitter audience of this study consists of white nationalists. Being popular with Nazis is not in itself reason to distrust the paper's content, but it certainly warrants examination of this, and similar literature. 2/12 ht
I apologize for the provided link not working. https://t.co/yIL42inIBA Please use this instead.
@GeneralSyuto @SOMEGUY7879 @MediocreIndigo @ConSelfOwns The point was to show how the consensus thinks iq is a relevant thing that gives us useful information. If you wanted to see studies specifically on heritability then this is one of countless: https:/
@peterjukes Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence https://t.co/qPlc9DfhP9
@captheiti @RosarotePanzer @FeGravity @Punchtendo Es ist eine Vielzahl von Genen bekannt, die die Entwicklung von Intelligenz beim Menschen maßgeblich beeinflussen. https://t.co/3x6DbBFgoj
@SarahGrynpas @roderickgraham GWAS for cognitive ability have been happening for a while. This is why David Reich hinted in his last book that IQ environmentalists are going to need a new cope fairly soon. https://t.co/dEX2TWd5gq
@SecretBaboon @wallischris10 @PragmaticPete @charlesmurray A DNA test alone can already explain roughly 10% of the variance in IQ. For matter of interest, uploading my DNA to Impute Me against these GWAS accurately predicted my IQ. https://t.co/00dtqQ6opU
@StevePittelli @itsbirdemic @charlesmurray Dude, stop the ad hominems. Not necessary. Here’s some (not mine) peer-reviewed work. https://t.co/uNu4bKemO5
One more reason to regard all IQ/GWAS studies as very expensive pseudo-profound bullshit. https://t.co/326ZpvGBER
@DavidePiffer Savage et al has done MR analysis for intelligence; they report a significant bidirectional causal association with schizophrenia https://t.co/IwYk884bWx
@benwilbrink @VeenenData @bijlesduits Een snelle zoekactie naar bv "GWAS IQ" levert wel veel onderzoeken op waarin allerlei loci gevonden zijn. Voorbeeldje: https://t.co/gqX1hKMlhP .
@KkWorking @FeliciaEntwine @ConceptualJames @KojoKoram About 1,000 genes have been identified so far. https://t.co/uoRSsirntT There are already genetic tests available for intelligence. https://t.co/fzUoDenobG But they will not be accurate for a few mo
@topologic_apple IQ & autism have a genetic correlation more than other conditions in the "psychiatric" bracket https://t.co/8bRC3krhCz
@KathyLevenston @ahh_chocolate @nytimes @serial https://t.co/P6pfIj1GTc Look at correlation between childhood IQ and educational attainment.
@lich109 @ProfesseurDrake @bigots_owned @Amanst3r https://t.co/P6pfIj1GTc Uhh, no. The correlation is much stronger. Click the image. Zoom in. Top line is "childhood IQ." Look at 3rd item: "Income." Look at the correlation between them.
@lich109 @ProfesseurDrake @bigots_owned @Amanst3r Who cares? That's a non-sequitur. I'm just saying there's cross-correlation with IQ to many other traits and outcomes. https://t.co/P6pfIj1GTc
RT @dr_appie: What does it mean when genes are associated with intelligence? Much of genetic influences underlying IQ aren't unique to IQ.…
@duttakapil @francdug @jurijfedorov @SamHarrisOrg https://t.co/P6pfIj1GTc I don't disagree. Some stuff is correlated and other stuff isn't. There is interesting material out there.
RT @dr_appie: What does it mean when genes are associated with intelligence? Much of genetic influences underlying IQ aren't unique to IQ.…
RT @RadekZyzik: Kiedyś napisałem tekst Biological Determinism and Its Enemies. Między innymi o tym, że wystarczy znać badania dot. wpływu g…
RT @RadekZyzik: Kiedyś napisałem tekst Biological Determinism and Its Enemies. Między innymi o tym, że wystarczy znać badania dot. wpływu g…
Kiedyś napisałem tekst Biological Determinism and Its Enemies. Między innymi o tym, że wystarczy znać badania dot. wpływu genów na zachowania i już wiadomo, że nie ma czegoś takiego jak determinizm genetyczny. Od biologii do zachowania daleka droga. Lubię
RT @dr_appie: What does it mean when genes are associated with intelligence? Much of genetic influences underlying IQ aren't unique to IQ.…