@jamft @jkenney @CoastalGasLink “Methane emissions of this magnitude, per unit of natural gas consumed, produce radiative forcing over a 20-year time horizon comparable to the CO2 from natural gas combustion.” https://t.co/pwkG1FmFNS
@Flash784 @jkenney @CoastalGasLink “‘Methane emissions of this magnitude, per unit of natural gas consumed, produce radiative forcing over a 20-yr time horizon comparable to the CO2 from natural gas combustion’ [i.e. comparable to burning coal vis a vis cl
@MandyWi20412394 @bone_jt @jqhughson @bendubya @VinceFantauzzi @Jacks90333033 @rebeldiva420 @TrumpOnDrugs @realDonaldTrump Fracking in the US: https://t.co/iC0sSYzojp " Moreover, the climate impact of 13 Tg CH4/year over a 20-year time horizon roughly equa
@steinitz_yuval מה עם משבר האקלים שטיינץ? אתה עדיין חושב שאין פליטות מתאן בתהליך הפקת גז? מתאן שמחמם פי 86 יותר חזק מפחמן https://t.co/YCzIsyyTI8
@steinitz_yuval שטיינץ בראיון "אין פליטות מתאן בתהליך הפקת הגז" באמת? " פליטות מתאן בתהליך הפקת נפט וגז בארה"ב היו 60% יותר גבוהות מההערכות של ארגון להגנת הסביבה של ארה"ב " https://t.co/YCzIsyyTI8 אז מי פה הצבוע?
3/5 @FareedZakaria The jury is still out on natural gas role in GHG emissions. 2018 @MIT study: ...for natural gas to be a major component to meet GHG reduction targets, methods of controlling methane leakage have to improve 30 to 90 percent. https://t.c
@francoislegault @PascalBerube @GNadeauDubois Le gaz dit «naturel» est une énergie fossile, comme le pétrole, dont l’exploitation est fortement émettrice en méthane.(80 fois celle du CO2) https://t.co/iSg9TioCCz
@AGU_Eos Oh neat, a similar study with the same basic conclusion! #reproducibility https://t.co/1O2CM3PBfa
@PAW96021431 @RepAOC @RepDarrenSoto Source: “13 ± 2 teragrams per year... Methane emissions of this magnitude, per unit of natural gas consumed, produce radiative forcing over a 20-year time horizon comparable to the CO2 from natural gas combustion“ meth
@Warrick31152938 @RepAOC @RepDarrenSoto This is the source, ThinkProgress just summarrizes it so you don’t have to read peer-reviewed scientific journals yourself to keep up with the latest findings: https://t.co/xVWVBYuLXQ
RT @MarkPlackett1: @KetanJ0 @GuardianAus @envirogov @CSIROStaff @CSIRO @UNFCCC @ICOS_RI When you quote papers do it correctly! #GHG Alvare…
Y el banco europeo de inversiones anuncia la descarbonización a bombo y platillo, cuando miras con detalle, el gas queda excluído. Todo esto con un pico atmosférica de metano nunca visto y sin las causas totalmente claras. Además las fugas subestimadas👇 h
@sanjaywagle a) This is latest available numbers for the US: https://t.co/r6PV95oKIK (Caveat: EPA numbers for distribution + no real data on Permian) b) I wrote this few years ago for EPA policy (sort of related to what you asked), numbers will be differen
@janneblomqvist @miljopartiet Ja, och det verkar vara mer en regel än undantag att det läcker i naturgassystemet. Enl. denna artikel från Science så motsvarar naturgasläckaget i USA ~2% av bruttoproduktionen. https://t.co/0ZX9QQEEz0
@thomasg_grizzle That's not entirely true. I'm not anti-natural gas, but the reality is that natural gas is not an effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. If you're looking for "carbon-free" or "less-carbon," nuclear, wind, solar, and geotherma
Not sure about "high-methane", but the "low-methane" scenario is a reasonable estimate of building emissions - it assumes an overall methane leakage of ~2.2%, which is similar to the most recent best estimate (2.3%). https://t.co/r6PV95oKIK
@clementealvarez @ensgismau A costa de un pico global de metano, parece ser, proveniente del auge del fracking y la industria del gas natural, con fugas subestimadas por la EPA en un 60%. Fundamental disminuir CH4 para abordar objetivos climáticos a corto
➡️Esto dice la ciencia sobre su contaminación👇https://t.co/cnFWSgd6bf ➡️Y esto sobre las emisiones de efecto invernadero en este sector (estaban 60% subestimadas en EEUU)👇 https://t.co/1ymuCWVafB ➡️Entonces, ¿Qué es lo que motiva a la @DGTes para etiquet
RT @AndreBardow: @gri_mm Rigoros haben Wisssenschaftler das 2018 untersucht @sciencemagazine : Klimaschäden für die kommenden 20 Jahre si…
@gri_mm Rigoros haben Wisssenschaftler das 2018 untersucht @sciencemagazine : Klimaschäden für die kommenden 20 Jahre sind so groß, als ob wir das Methan 2x verbrannt hätten... Dabei wären diese Methan-Emissionen technisch einfach vermeidbar... https:
@rrocasalamero @Teresaribera @howarth_cornell fugas de metano subestimadas en un 60% en EEUU https://t.co/QbFOrYxL4H
Sin embargo, nuestro @mitecogob considera que las fugas de metano representan sólo el 1% de todo el gas transportado, a pesar de que en EEUU las cifras oficiales estaban un 60% subestimadas y las fugas representan un 2,3% de la producción de gas👇 https://t
@HyperHydr0 @MLiebreich Not in practice as fracked gas IS on going, & leaks from entire sector are threat over 20 year time frame. Should be banned immediately, replace with wind & solar. Point is both must end quickly. https://t.co/NLg5HYguvk
@raymondbonnate1 @GoldbergNic Le mythe du bridge fuel c'est hélas de la science de tableur Excel, un peu comme le carbon offsetting. La réalité est probablement moins sympathique : https://t.co/3gcLNdwFFF Brûler du carbone mort, on fait cela depuis 2M d'an
U.S. Supreme Court lets climate scientist's defamation claim proceed “Mann could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of climate science, except for instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data,” Simberg wrote. https://t.co/af7AJyN1rS
You can see how the oil and gas industry goons tortured the methane emission statistics to say something that was not true Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain https://t.co/DtvmTyAG9f
RT @FructoseNo: It's convenient to 'blame' GHG emissions on #innocentcows +farming but real culprits are our industry/transport. https://t.…
RT @LaaliMD: Isn't natural gas cleaner than coal? Sure, if we zoom-in on how NG burns in a power plant➡️ 50-60% less CO2 But, when we add…
Isn't natural gas cleaner than coal? Sure, if we zoom-in on how NG burns in a power plant➡️ 50-60% less CO2 But, when we add methane emissions across the natural gas “life”cycle➡️ climate-warming potential is comparable to coal https://t.co/aTqU2vy9bf #N
@croselund @JustinHGillis @EricGimon @howarth_cornell Best case US estimate for leakage is 2 - 2.7%, with a median of 2.3%. Measurements done more recently by me & others also show similar data (caveat: Permian data is just coming in & likely highe
@hausfath @CostaSamaras And then, after multiple field studies looking at the complete natural gas supply chain in US, there was this: https://t.co/HAtMbsyYTK affirming basic point of the earlier paper, with actual data. /fin.
A recent synthesis study on US oil and gas methane emissions, with potential implications for the Inventory. https://t.co/1l3bq52yF3 I wrote about it here: https://t.co/jVHwcylaQV
RT @dwatson_edf: @jaldina1 @atrembath @DByers21 @EPA The most comprehensive study to date puts supply chain methane leakage at 2.3%, with l…
@jaldina1 @atrembath @DByers21 @EPA The most comprehensive study to date puts supply chain methane leakage at 2.3%, with life cycle break-even for short-term climate impact vs. coal at ~3%. Without regs for supply chain methane leakage, you undermine most
@KonProg @egghat In den USA sind’s 2,3% laut Science Mag. https://t.co/GfY3Y2Pqlp Wenn man das z.B. Im Vergleich zu Benzin als Kraftstoff im Auto setzt, hat Erdgas zwar den direkten Vergleich am Auspuff gewonnen. Ist aber im Ganzen ca 63% schädlicher...
@agronomistag @cadwego They also have their own footprints. Synthetic N's GHG impact looks worse & worse as we learn more about nat gas. https://t.co/Y1okQVS0Yp Phosphate mining's depredations in Florida are well documented. https://t.co/ks85GHWNLX
Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain | the definition of dirty tricks... https://t.co/9kmH4JtnAR
@civiltalker @hausfath @Lacertko By Alvarez et al., you mean this one? https://t.co/Fg05IA3Xgh
Hey @Stphn_Lacey @shaylekann here’s a recent estimate of methane emissions from US oil and gas systems. This paper is the best current synthesis on the problem in the US: https://t.co/jpcDwGhBzs
RT @MarkPlackett1: @KetanJ0 @GuardianAus @envirogov @CSIROStaff @CSIRO @UNFCCC @ICOS_RI When you quote papers do it correctly! #GHG Alvare…
RT @MarkPlackett1: @p_hannam @ScienceChiefAu Att @DrLarryMarshall Please confirm corrections to emissions estimates for GISERA there are s…
RT @MarkPlackett1: @p_hannam @ScienceChiefAu Att @DrLarryMarshall Please confirm corrections to emissions estimates for GISERA there are s…
RT @MarkPlackett1: @p_hannam @ScienceChiefAu Att @DrLarryMarshall Please confirm corrections to emissions estimates for GISERA there are s…
RT @MarkPlackett1: @p_hannam @ScienceChiefAu Att @DrLarryMarshall Please confirm corrections to emissions estimates for GISERA there are s…
@p_hannam @ScienceChiefAu Att @DrLarryMarshall Please confirm corrections to emissions estimates for GISERA there are significant errors and misleading interpretations for NGAF Literally an understatement of 29% for UCG #Methane #CH4 cc @ANAO_Australia ht
RT @MarkPlackett1: @KetanJ0 @GuardianAus @envirogov @CSIROStaff @CSIRO @UNFCCC @ICOS_RI When you quote papers do it correctly! #GHG Alvare…
@GrogsGamut @adamlmorton Myth busted how good is Gas? Pretty terrible https://t.co/UrHCZVvrdl
@AustralisTerry @GreatGasScam @GeorgeBender68 @1EarthMedia #HowGoodisGas? pretty bloody terrible https://t.co/UrHCZVvrdl
@sarahrees How good is Gas https://t.co/UrHCZVvrdl
@KetanJ0 @GuardianAus @envirogov @CSIROStaff @CSIRO @UNFCCC @ICOS_RI When you quote papers do it correctly! #GHG Alvarez et al 2018 https://t.co/NvNcV1L78C Incorrect and misleading paraphasing its 30% of Gas production 2.3% of gross production. #HowGoodis
@AJWVictoriaBC @jjhorgan @GeorgeHeyman @Pembina @Earthworks @mcgillu These guys say the leak rate is more like 2.3% which I think is 35% higher. In which case you can start stacking the trucks. https://t.co/ytErabiU9z @AJWVictoriaBC @jjhorgan @georgehe
It is especially important because methane emissions are underestimated. In the US, research has shown they are 60% higher than estimated by the EPA https://t.co/VzYqM2XP97
RT @CoalTransitions: [2/4] US scientists from 16 research institutions reassessed the magnitude of this leakage. They suggest that this dis…
[2/4] US scientists from 16 research institutions reassessed the magnitude of this leakage. They suggest that this discrepancy exists because current inventory methods miss emissions that occur during abnormal operating conditions. https://t.co/63jBOj0xTb
@DanKEberhart @Forbes The peer reviewed study from the world’s largest science association found a 60% increase in methane leaks from oil and gas production in US. What’s the discrepancy? https://t.co/0aoibdOA9x
RT @anlomedad: @PaulEDawson @DormouseRoared 13%? In the US, leaked CH4 emissions in production & transport are 2.3% of the gros gas extract…
@PaulEDawson @DormouseRoared 13%? In the US, leaked CH4 emissions in production & transport are 2.3% of the gros gas extracted. Assuming, AUS gas tech&transport is the same, is an update to the stated "13%" by the amount from leaked emissions in
@AbrahamOlomouc @baldwinbiogas @Sustainable2050 From 2018: https://t.co/ftsSq9oJnj scrolling through its citing articles I also found this https://t.co/ynF93D9D7P proving those 2.3% via measuring "in the Uintah Basin during wintertime stagnation episodes"
Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain https://t.co/q9QrCxTQ26
RT @BlairKing_ca: In this case the authors rely on a single study in Science by Alvarez et al https://t.co/0TrbNGQobj that calculated that…
In this case the authors rely on a single study in Science by Alvarez et al https://t.co/0TrbNGQobj that calculated that 2.3% of US production of LNG was lost in the form of fugitive emissions which wipes out the savings in using LNG for power #bcpoli #cdn
https://t.co/dE7Xb6Jrvb Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain, suggests fracking having bigger impact on climate change than previously understood. #sciencenews https://t.co/6HlSqV0Ilz
@SuMastodon @jjacobs22 Carbon-captured natural gas plants are the new panacea for some, but they gloss over fugitive emissions (https://t.co/vORQEWNHpe) from mining the natural gas (fracking) and they gloss over where we will store all that CO2. (continue
RT @MSanchezMainar: Last July 2018 a study in Science found that U.S. oil & gas operations are leaking 60% more methane than previously cal…
RT @MSanchezMainar: Last July 2018 a study in Science found that U.S. oil & gas operations are leaking 60% more methane than previously cal…
RT @MSanchezMainar: Last July 2018 a study in Science found that U.S. oil & gas operations are leaking 60% more methane than previously cal…
RT @MSanchezMainar: Last July 2018 a study in Science found that U.S. oil & gas operations are leaking 60% more methane than previously cal…
Last July 2018 a study in Science found that U.S. oil & gas operations are leaking 60% more methane than previously calculated. Methane does not originate solely by agriculture. 👉 https://t.co/Te5vA1KbCG
@danrejto Based on the EPA inventory, I don't think it would add that much, though it is concerning the estimates are potentially off that much. https://t.co/6ipGITYVCi I was more alarmed by this study from last year, b/c this would make a big absolute dif
@maxim_k @Umwelthilfe Gleichzeitig machen die Methan-Emissionen den positiven Klimaeffekt wieder zu nichte! Das "Grunlastargument" ist ein Irrweg, der den Carbon Lock-In nur weiter stärkt und die Erneuerbaren drastisch ausbremst. https://t.co/EtQLw7ZIvy ht
Numerous researchers have published on this issue. Notably, this got widespread media coverage just last year, that industry had actually been vastly under-reporting their #methane #natgas leaks to regulators. @sciencemagazine publication on this: https://
@Le_Reveilleur @jphil_mingam @audreygarric On a commencé à le mesurer, par exemple ici https://t.co/6iML6Ztwcu ...et on s'est rendu compte que ces émissions étaient environ 60% plus importantes que ce qu'on pensait.
@datarade @AOC Link to the original. Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain | Science https://t.co/z4UUBQgVvt
@kallanish Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain https://t.co/ol04XZmgOC https://t.co/eTujUKqQV6
RT @fleroy1974: @_eleanorina @Smark_phd @GHGGuru And this: https://t.co/gu5nVaZu3e
RT @fleroy1974: @_eleanorina @Smark_phd @GHGGuru And this: https://t.co/gu5nVaZu3e
RT @fleroy1974: @_eleanorina @Smark_phd @GHGGuru And this: https://t.co/gu5nVaZu3e
Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain https://t.co/ol04XZmgOC https://t.co/DbN33iWvPp
@JustinTrudeau @lngcanada Hey fossil fuel addicts, the science for a healthy planet doesn’t support your industry https://t.co/Mh509DOR91
@NWRAT Spreadsheet analysis I did back in June 2008 when Science study here came out: https://t.co/PvljrPKZca Just dug it back up and about to tweet it out...
@hausfath You are free to differ but if realistic rates of methane leakage are used and present flaring practices continue, the GHG advantages of natural gas compared to coal disappear. https://t.co/n5hexCuCWz https://t.co/stOvk0jTHK https://t.co/KzzmzB
RT @GreatLakesPeck: In case you missed the latest re: the climate & pollution impact of natural gas: “in 2015, supply chain emissions were…
RT @GreatLakesPeck: In case you missed the latest re: the climate & pollution impact of natural gas: “in 2015, supply chain emissions were…
RT @GreatLakesPeck: In case you missed the latest re: the climate & pollution impact of natural gas: “in 2015, supply chain emissions were…
In case you missed the latest re: the climate & pollution impact of natural gas: “in 2015, supply chain emissions were ∼60% higher than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency inventory estimate” https://t.co/c47YWbrJA9
RT @GastivistsB: Artikel aus @sciencemagazine: #Methan-Leckagen bei Förderung & Transport machen #Fracking-Gas aus USA so klimaschädlich wi…
Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain: At >2% leakage, #naturalgas is worse for climate than #coal. https://t.co/dTVa8bhd7J
RT @huprice: @BalderClaassen @howarth_cornell Yes, we want the same outcome. Here’s a recent article in Science on updated methane emission…
RT @huprice: @BalderClaassen @howarth_cornell Yes, we want the same outcome. Here’s a recent article in Science on updated methane emission…
@chrisspray @FarmingUK Sermon making progress so took a break to dig this out on methane spike source (it's not Ag.) https://t.co/DJ09ZzH9y5
RT @GastivistsB: Artikel aus @sciencemagazine: #Methan-Leckagen bei Förderung & Transport machen #Fracking-Gas aus USA so klimaschädlich wi…