↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Blood Groups in Infection and Host Susceptibility

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 905)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
137 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Blood Groups in Infection and Host Susceptibility
Published in
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, June 2015
DOI 10.1128/cmr.00109-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Cooling

Abstract

Blood group antigens represent polymorphic traits inherited among individuals and populations. At present, there are 34 recognized human blood groups and hundreds of individual blood group antigens and alleles. Differences in blood group antigen expression can increase or decrease host susceptibility to many infections. Blood groups can play a direct role in infection by serving as receptors and/or coreceptors for microorganisms, parasites, and viruses. In addition, many blood group antigens facilitate intracellular uptake, signal transduction, or adhesion through the organization of membrane microdomains. Several blood groups can modify the innate immune response to infection. Several distinct phenotypes associated with increased host resistance to malaria are overrepresented in populations living in areas where malaria is endemic, as a result of evolutionary pressures. Microorganisms can also stimulate antibodies against blood group antigens, including ABO, T, and Kell. Finally, there is a symbiotic relationship between blood group expression and maturation of the gastrointestinal microbiome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 220 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Professor 15 7%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 10%
Chemistry 9 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 39 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#155,087
of 14,569,513 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#21
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,716
of 232,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,569,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.