RT @hugopottisch: @matthewhayek Same shareholder ownership as Big Tobacco and same tactics too. But also same solution for society. Ban the…
@matthewhayek Same shareholder ownership as Big Tobacco and same tactics too. But also same solution for society. Ban the ads. Tax it. Add visual warnings. The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food
I think it is good that Bill separates the intelligence part from the "ability to edit genese". These two are rarely related. PS: Bacteria produce CH4 for a reason. Anybody know why and what would happen if they did not? Anybody? Bueller? #collapse htt
RT @hugopottisch: @ScienceNotDogma Why are beef & dairy ads allowed (high fat no fiber)? Why are soda ads allowed (sugar without fiber)? W…
@ScienceNotDogma Why are beef & dairy ads allowed (high fat no fiber)? Why are soda ads allowed (sugar without fiber)? Why are car ads allowed? Flying ads? https://t.co/xPn0wjp265
Green energy as well etc etc even plastic one owned by coca cola example the BPA controversy in plastic generating estrogen ) For tobacco famous case n how they discredit it https://t.co/ijzHcPqKen https://t.co/h1L8wcFmGZ Starting since 1953 https://t.co/
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
@HannahEDaly Tobacco textbook 101 🚬 https://t.co/H5VIi83baS https://t.co/ys0ImkBj5w
@VirtualMatt6626 @autocorrect2_0 "The tobacco industry had a playbook, a script, that emphasized personal responsibility, paying scientists who delivered research that instilled doubt, criticizing the “junk” science that found harms associated with smoking
RT @bookriver_2: タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
RT @bookriver_2: タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
RT @bookriver_2: タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
RT @bookriver_2: タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
@AlexEpstein Same MO https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @bookriver_2: タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
RT @bookriver_2: タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
RT @bookriver_2: タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
タバコ産業が卑劣な手法を使い、何百万人も亡くなりました。食品産業も同様なのか?という辛辣なタイトル。 タバコ業界が喫煙と関連する健康リスクを軽視し、一般の認識を操作し、利益追求のために政策決定に影響を与えた戦略が過去にあった。
@ggkuhnle I would not prohibit smoking but ban ads and tax it. Let's apply what we know works best for #obesity #weightloss https://t.co/xPn0wjp265 https://t.co/teR7OHxTcV
@bakrantz @ScepticalDoctor That's what lobby wants us to believe. But we are dealing with the same tobacco shareholders as before for 🚬 As history has shown - legal change can happen. We do the right thing after trying everything else? The playbook is si
It doesn't matter if it's #Cigarettes #Climate #Cars #Cows Here the ancient #Gaslighting textbook 💸📕 that all lobbies use has a few key points that are easy to recall and follow
@ScepticalDoctor 🚬📕#1 Rule. It's not the cigarette ads and cheap cigarette everywhere - it's you. To claim otherwise is a bad argument. https://t.co/xPn0wjp265 https://t.co/5iIIldjSk5
Education is the best action changer.
@ScepticalDoctor Cigarettes & Climate & Cars & Cows & Coke & ... https://t.co/zyp5irzeXm
Cigarettes & Climate & Cars & Cows The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food? https://t.co/xPn0wjpzVD https://t.co/L7dq5OujG4
"Criticize studies that hurt industry as junk science.” Tactically speaking, jumping right to Step 4 of the script in the Big Tobacco Playbook is a bold move. #DontLookUP #TobaccoPlaybook https://t.co/DevXSlmAIK https://t.co/wy0tivXUCp
Maybe @thehill should do a little background checking before publishing commentary and not just rely on credentials? Part of the tobacco playbook is to use seemingly independent experts to push messaging defending their products. https://t.co/H4qKRFtFK0
@cjbakermd @KLVeritas @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @VigilantFox You have 3,500 peer reviewed studies most of which you have totally misconstrued because you are bias & simply not educated enough. Tobacco giants also produced peer reviewed studies that to
@JuliaHB1 @ClimateTheMovie @Martin_Durkin Reader Note: Big Tobacco knew smoking caused cancer in the 1950s. To delay legislation it embarked on a huge PR campaign in the media, signing up politicians, even some Doctors. The campaign was a success, delayin
@idthreedots I read and re-read. And it's super irresponsible. No citation on cancer cases when it's an open secret a lot of the "cigarettes don't cause cancer" researches were funded by the cigarette lobby. https://t.co/46R7yMrgo1
@_ppmv @Mark_Ungrin @MarieTattersall @starledger @sameo416 @jmcrookston Because one or two doctors were to blame. All physicians were to blame. Forget the Semmelweis effect was integral to the Tobacco industry abusing a Scientific Playbook. Forget the
Food was a new frontier in addiction science, one that didn't carry the negative connotations that cigarettes were quickly developing. We're left with the results today, even as large tobacco has left the food market, in part spooked by legal liability. h
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
RT @tigresseleanor: The tobacco industry had a playbook, a script, that emphasized personal responsibility, paying scientists who delivered…
RT @tigresseleanor: The tobacco industry had a playbook, a script, that emphasized personal responsibility, paying scientists who delivered…
RT @matiwinnetou: Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or wh…
Yes, this is very sad, albeit nothing new, this is how legacy world works. "Sugar and Fat Scientists" type of deal or when "tobacco companies" hired scientists to do research to steer public perception away from negative impacts of smoking. https://t.co
@sadams_s @CollignonPeter Likely bought & paid for as tobacco scientists were. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
@MalcolmDunn1961 @RichardJMurphy Just because your ignorant doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. https://t.co/phOtM93DSu
@memiclimatici @TheDisproof @JunkScience Yeah in the 1920s....... Doctors recommend smoking Lucky Strike based on the $tudie$ https://t.co/QMA2cNHgh0
@frblues66 @GeWoessner @LePoint Lis en entier. Stp https://t.co/hhdPQOcKtX
@frblues66 @GeWoessner @LePoint Commence là https://t.co/hhdPQOcKtX
RT @felly500: Big Tobacco Played Dirty & Millions Died. How Similar Is Food? Food industry is obviously different from tobacco in importa…
Big Tobacco Played Dirty & Millions Died. How Similar Is Food? Food industry is obviously different from tobacco in important ways significant similarities in actions that these industries have taken in response to concern that their products cause h
The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food? https://t.co/25t9rtlXii
Until today, I was not aware of the risk of caffeine - so all the coffee shops that pop up everywhere are part of the big plan of industry to hook us to junk food. https://t.co/du63AJhOKq https://t.co/lJpupvursZ
@Aufdecker Zigaretten https://t.co/NXJOvKCu6h
Beware of research biases, especially from industry-funded studies! 🚫💼 Not all statistically significant results = real-world impact. 📈≠🩺 Rely on diverse sources, not just media summaries. 📰🔄📚 Health is multifaceted; no shortcuts! https://t.co/jHDb6Xh09O
RT @RealCheckMarker: The muzzling of science in America was very well described in the mockumentary #DontLookUP There's no accountability…
@drsimonegold Many metrics & mitigations not taken into account by Pandata. Same MO https://t.co/tAkubq7PHM
@CKellyUAP Same MO being played out by Craig & co. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
@JamesMelville One day the penny may drop & you may realise you were used. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @RealCheckMarker: The muzzling of science in America was very well described in the mockumentary #DontLookUP There's no accountability…
RT @RealCheckMarker: The muzzling of science in America was very well described in the mockumentary #DontLookUP There's no accountability…
The muzzling of science in America was very well described in the mockumentary #DontLookUP There's no accountability for corrupt politics in the USA when they abandon public health concerns over economic profits. https://t.co/DevXSlm2Tc https://t.co/5URpz
@benson_blazer @LAndersonCAKS @krassenstein Yes. Scientist are paid money to create "models" , and the outcome is always what the beneficiary that paid wants. Anything to keep an income. Same scientist who used to say tobacco is good for you. Humans are
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @tigresseleanor: The tobacco industry had a playbook, a script, that emphasized personal responsibility, paying scientists who delivered…
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
RT @tigresseleanor: Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
Same MO is being used re Covid & Climate change. https://t.co/tAkubq7hSe
@TheOmniLiberal Did you forget BIG tobacco lying and falsifying data for decades? https://t.co/Z14x0FfPh4
@MrHarryCole Readers might like to note that Big Tobbaco knew that it caused cancer in the 1950's however it raised a successful campaign with client media to obscure the truth for decades - it was successful. Thousands died. https://t.co/ElLboc5dWU
@DeborahMeaden Had same on much smaller scale. Very persistent. Seemingly unlimited time to engage in dispute using fake 'facts' re climate. Keep tweeting this - it's straight out of Big Tobbaco's successful 1950s playbook. Similar by high profile right wi
RT @pwete1: @BWallArthur Been tweeting this a lot (sorry folks) - have a quick read. Shows how Big Tobbaco successfully hid the truth about…
@BWallArthur Been tweeting this a lot (sorry folks) - have a quick read. Shows how Big Tobbaco successfully hid the truth about cigarettes & cancer for decades, in pursuit of continuing profits. Relied on false research, & compliant, grifting, comm
@PaulCanOnlyGet1 Have a quick read of this to see what's likely to be going on here - they're all out in force last few days .... https://t.co/ElLboc5dWU
@SimonPease1 @AllisonPearson It's more likely this .... https://t.co/ElLboc5dWU
@DeborahMeaden This is the game the Right are playing with climate - delay and obscuration. Taken from the playbook of Big Tobbaco in the 50's, who used sympathetic media to delay legislation costing thousands of lives - this time it's the planet. https://
@RogerB_worth @afneil This article neatly explains the game the right are playing with climate change - the same game they successfully played with tobacco. Delay and obscuration. https://t.co/ElLboc5dWU
@savvysteve1 @daraobriain This article neatly explains the game the right are playing with climate change - the same game they successfully played with tobacco. Delay & obfuscate. https://t.co/ElLboc5dWU
@daraobriain I keep tweeting this. How Big Tobbaco, who knew about the cancer risk in the 1950s, successfully delayed legislation for decades waging a campaign with sympathetic media. Of course, thousands died. https://t.co/ElLboc5dWU
@TeresaC123 It's not ignorance. Big Tobacco knew smoking caused cancer in the 1950s, it waged a successful campaign using sympathetic 'journalists' to delay legislation to protect profits. It was brilliantly successful - of course thousands died. https://
@afneil Reader Note: Big Tobbaco knew that tobacco caused cancer in the 1950s. It fought a brilliant campaign through sympathetic media to delay effective health measures for decades - vastly increasing profits. Of course, thousands died. https://t.co/ElL