| Title |
Refining the Ammonia Hypothesis A Physiology-Driven Approach to the Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mayo Clinic Proceedings, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.03.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elliot B. Tapper, Z. Gordon Jiang, Vilas R. Patwardhan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| India | 7 | 6% |
| Mexico | 7 | 6% |
| Spain | 7 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 20% |
| Scientists | 17 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#567,450
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#383
of 5,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,627
of 280,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#8
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.