| Title |
Caramel Color in Soft Drinks and Exposure to 4-Methylimidazole: A Quantitative Risk Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0118138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tyler J. S. Smith, Julia A. Wolfson, Ding Jiao, Michael J. Crupain, Urvashi Rangan, Amir Sapkota, Sara N. Bleich, Keeve E. Nachman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 199 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 18% |
| Turkey | 22 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 99 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 168 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 9% |
| Scientists | 13 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#60,426
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,021
of 224,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#578
of 271,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#14
of 4,374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.