↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Polarizing Figures: Executive Power and Institutional Conflict in Asian Democracies

Overview of attention for article published in American Behavioral Scientist, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Polarizing Figures: Executive Power and Institutional Conflict in Asian Democracies
Published in
American Behavioral Scientist, January 2018
DOI 10.1177/0002764218759577
Authors

Slater, Dan, Arugay, Aries A., Dan Slater, Aries A. Arugay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#609,239
of 11,498,576 outputs
Outputs from American Behavioral Scientist
#98
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,883
of 259,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Behavioral Scientist
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,498,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.