Title |
Global Demand for Natural Resources Eliminated More Than 100,000 Bornean Orangutans
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.053 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Voigt, Serge A. Wich, Marc Ancrenaz, Erik Meijaard, Nicola Abram, Graham L. Banes, Gail Campbell-Smith, Laura J. d’Arcy, Roberto A. Delgado, Andi Erman, David Gaveau, Benoit Goossens, Stefanie Heinicke, Max Houghton, Simon J. Husson, Ashley Leiman, Karmele Llano Sanchez, Niel Makinuddin, Andrew J. Marshall, Ari Meididit, Jukka Miettinen, Roger Mundry, Musnanda, Nardiyono, Anton Nurcahyo, Kisar Odom, Adventus Panda, Didik Prasetyo, Aldrianto Priadjati, Purnomo, Andjar Rafiastanto, Anne E. Russon, Truly Santika, Jamartin Sihite, Stephanie Spehar, Matthew Struebig, Enrique Sulbaran-Romero, Albertus Tjiu, Jessie Wells, Kerrie A. Wilson, Hjalmar S. Kühl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 379 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 36 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 35 | 9% |
Spain | 17 | 4% |
Canada | 10 | 3% |
Belgium | 9 | 2% |
Mexico | 9 | 2% |
Indonesia | 8 | 2% |
Australia | 8 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 2% |
Other | 69 | 18% |
Unknown | 172 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 326 | 86% |
Scientists | 36 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 353 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 16% |
Student > Master | 49 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
Researcher | 35 | 10% |
Other | 22 | 6% |
Other | 45 | 13% |
Unknown | 106 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 70 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 3% |
Other | 43 | 12% |
Unknown | 113 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2006. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,656
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#49
of 14,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86
of 473,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#2
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.