| Title |
NCCN Guidelines Insights: T-Cell Lymphomas, Version 2.2018.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven M Horwitz, Stephen M Ansell, Weiyun Z Ai, Jeffrey Barnes, Stefan K Barta, Michael Choi, Mark W Clemens, Ahmet Dogan, John P Greer, Ahmad Halwani, Bradley M Haverkos, Richard T Hoppe, Eric Jacobsen, Deepa Jagadeesh, Youn H Kim, Matthew A Lunning, Amitkumar Mehta, Neha Mehta-Shah, Yahurio Oki, Elise A Olsen, Barbara Pro, Saurabh A Rajguru, Satish Shanbhag, Andrei Shustov, Lubomir Sokol, Pallawi Torka, Ryan Wilcox, Basem William, Jasmine Zain, Mary A Dwyer, Hema Sundar |
| Abstract |
Natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphomas are a rare and distinct subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NK/T-cell lymphomas are predominantly extranodal and most of these are nasal type, often localized to the upper aerodigestive tract. Because extranodal NK/T-cell lymphomas (ENKL) are rare malignancies, randomized trials comparing different regimens have not been conducted to date and standard therapy has not yet been established for these patients. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with ENKL as outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for T-Cell Lymphomas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#240,673
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#65
of 1,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,621
of 449,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.