RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
RT @DocTerremoto: Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figu…
Rupture speeds are not easy to estimate, especially for old earthquakes before the advent of dense seismic networks. Figure 1 in Huang et al (2016 https://t.co/EWmk0QRzSB) summarizes speed estimates of fast earthquakes and their uncertainties (when availab
@KammerResearch @HanBao_UCLA That’s possible but this earthquake is slower than Eshelby’s speed sqrt(2)*Vs, which is unstable. We interpret it as a result of rupture within a damaged fault zone: https://t.co/wigOn0RPIZ