RT @NeuroSGS: Using a multivariate support vector machine (SVM; machine learning), various neuroanatomical sites and variables were assesse…
RT @NeuroSGS: Using a multivariate support vector machine (SVM; machine learning), various neuroanatomical sites and variables were assesse…
RT @NeuroSGS: Using a multivariate support vector machine (SVM; machine learning), various neuroanatomical sites and variables were assesse…
RT @NeuroSGS: Using a multivariate support vector machine (SVM; machine learning), various neuroanatomical sites and variables were assesse…
Using a multivariate support vector machine (SVM; machine learning), various neuroanatomical sites and variables were assessed to predict sex: https://t.co/W4WidrM5vB https://t.co/PW40T2oMjF
RT @polygenic_: 11. « Le modèle formé a présenté une précision de prédiction de 83 % après validation croisée et a correctement prédit le s…
11. « Le modèle formé a présenté une précision de prédiction de 83 % après validation croisée et a correctement prédit le sexe de 77 % des sujets de l'ensemble de données multisites indépendantes. » https://t.co/tYHE07LjZy
3. Une équipe a découvert que les modèles utilisant les composantes du volume et de la concentration de la matière grise du cerveau étaient capables de différencier les hommes des femmes avec une précision généralisable supérieure à 93 %. » https://t.co/m
@FuxxFell @hjvoss @FParianen @RichardDawkins @sapinker Das ist ein Artikel, der lediglich wissenschaftliche Artikel mit Link zitiert. Nämlich diese: https://t.co/xKHYKoxDMG https://t.co/U265dFOIc7 https://t.co/c8wQh10Su1 https://t.co/v8ix80u5jy https://t.c
RT @El_Axel_Linares: Perdón, mira a ver si así si funciona. https://t.co/symii6GLNu https://t.co/EjXiJ0NIBB https://t.co/qkwUR8FMAM http…
@camberaFeminist Ahí lo tienes https://t.co/X6Ah9Owkhp
Perdón, mira a ver si así si funciona. https://t.co/symii6GLNu https://t.co/EjXiJ0NIBB https://t.co/qkwUR8FMAM https://t.co/6e0DAsBfQB https://t.co/TafWamNwwD
@HighBall_8 @vell237 Estudios y artículos certificados por pares: 1 https://t.co/VWLYInQ7Sv 2 https://t.co/SluYFhrrnt 3 https://t.co/B2CjUuyuzt 4 https://t.co/axxRjOTpT1 5 https://t.co/zi7ZQ0UUkS
@violindesafina @Jota_Trans Mira, estudios *neurosexistas para que te diviertas un rato: 1 https://t.co/VWLYInQ7Sv 2 https://t.co/SluYFhrrnt 3 https://t.co/B2CjUuyuzt 4 https://t.co/axxRjOTpT1 5 https://t.co/zi7ZQ0UUkS 6 https://t.co/MDgGbKUo38
@fairleft Just read the thread and click the links. FYI the biological truths relate to demographic averages. Once you identify and accept them as a part of yourself rather than reject/deny it, it’s easier to work against it.
RT @a_centrism: 5/ Other methods have an accuracy range of more than 80% to as much as 93%. Studies include: https://t.co/fbnQ7IXIt0 ht…
@mariagilnavarro @CurriMrs @DoFemCo Y hay más.
@DoFemCo Otro mito feminista. Llevando un debate científico muy viejo al campo de la moral. Los neurobiólogos no opinan lo mismo y si ven diferencias. https://t.co/9DaYTYJ9G6 https://t.co/azhjtGgnW7 https://t.co/QnJDoCgVqB https://t.co/PQ5z6AOysp https://
@oremlares @ChaokoMaker La idea de que el cerebro es 100% femenino o masculino, sí, fue descartada. Q hay diferencias neuroanatómicas, no. https://t.co/q2HrC19bWL el estudio es para mostrarte que no han sido descartadas. Una de tus fuentes dice que hay car
RT @Scientific_Bird: How well can we establish sex from the differences in neuroanatomical features? A team of researchers found that they…
RT @SwipeWright: Also neuroanatomy in youths: "The trained model exhibited an 83% cross-validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predic…
RT @Scientific_Bird: How well can we establish sex from the differences in neuroanatomical features? A team of researchers found that they…
RT @SwipeWright: Also neuroanatomy in youths: "The trained model exhibited an 83% cross-validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predic…
RT @SwipeWright: Also neuroanatomy in youths: "The trained model exhibited an 83% cross-validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predic…
RT @SwipeWright: Also neuroanatomy in youths: "The trained model exhibited an 83% cross-validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predic…
RT @SwipeWright: Also neuroanatomy in youths: "The trained model exhibited an 83% cross-validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predic…
RT @SwipeWright: Also neuroanatomy in youths: "The trained model exhibited an 83% cross-validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predic…
Also neuroanatomy in youths: "The trained model exhibited an 83% cross-validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predicted the sex of 77% of the subjects from the independent multi-site dataset." https://t.co/nqxz5aKNXt
How well can we establish sex from the differences in neuroanatomical features? A team of researchers found that they could accurately predict sex with 83% accuracy in cross-validated set and 77% in independent data set. (5/8) https://t.co/ZqV7PClrXs
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @amyalkon: Great point from @StuartJRitchie on how reliably you can predict a person's sex from details of their brain. Very, very. http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
Yes, NYT have willfully misunderstood OR don't understand the notion of predictive accuracy. (Perhaps their article is a mosaic?)
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @amyalkon: Great point from @StuartJRitchie on how reliably you can predict a person's sex from details of their brain. Very, very. http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
Great point from @StuartJRitchie on how reliably you can predict a person's sex from details of their brain. Very, very.
Melhor ainda aqui https://t.co/1QcT817BUa
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
RT @StuartJRitchie: This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliab…
This (https://t.co/IkD7rwkbvV) is so weird, bordering on perverse. Q is: given many details of their brain, how reliably can you predict someone's sex? Research shows it's between 80% (https://t.co/tzKdakLOZi) & 93% (https://t.co/ZxIeal15kQ; https://t
@mrkhtake2 @jonjonedinburgh @charssocialism @MichaelConroy68 @Fabmrsjohnson @strump3t @alxndrleon @stonewalluk Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.065. Epub 2018 Feb 3. Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex
RT @_Credible_Hulk: But I've been told men and women are the same and all differences are social constructs. https://t.co/pbdIEX61vP
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…
RT @DrJamesBooth: Nice work – it has been challenging to establish reliable sex differences in neuroimages. Our early work suggested that g…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…
RT @DrJamesBooth: Nice work – it has been challenging to establish reliable sex differences in neuroimages. Our early work suggested that g…
Nice work – it has been challenging to establish reliable sex differences in neuroimages. Our early work suggested that girls rely on a supramodal language network, whereas boys process visual and auditory words differently. https://t.co/vXFj64qwRv #sexdif
RT @hbdchick: machine learning can predict whether someone is male or female w/data from brain imaging ca. 80% of the time: Neuroanatomical…
RT @hbdchick: machine learning can predict whether someone is male or female w/data from brain imaging ca. 80% of the time: Neuroanatomical…
RT @hbdchick: machine learning can predict whether someone is male or female w/data from brain imaging ca. 80% of the time: Neuroanatomical…
machine learning can predict whether someone is male or female w/data from brain imaging ca. 80% of the time: Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning https://t.co/FEfmbdgTVI
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…
Men and women are the same, sir. https://t.co/FLhh69xLCZ
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…
Además, cuando la posibilidad de acertar tirando una moneda al aire es del 50%, que al utilizar "big data" e inteligencia artificial se llegue al 77%, pues no me parece para tirar cohetes. https://t.co/52Id5oS4vI
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Can machine learning correctly predict whether someone is male or female, just with data from brain imaging? Yes, ~80%…