| Title |
Best Practices From the APDR Improving Medical Student Exposure to Interventional Radiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic Radiology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daryl T. Goldman, Gail L. Peters, Aaron M. Fischman, George G. Vatakencherry, Peter R. Bream, Jonathan G. Martin, Janice M. Newsome, Zachary L. Bercu, Michael A. Schacht, Karen S. Johnson, James M. Milburn, Seng Ong, Vivek Kalia, Eric England, Darel E. Heitkamp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 69% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 32% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 32% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2019.
All research outputs
#820,926
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Academic Radiology
#31
of 2,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,256
of 451,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Radiology
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.