| Title |
Understanding the role of physician attire on patient perceptions: a systematic review of the literature— targeting attire to improve likelihood of rapport (TAILOR) investigators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006578 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Michael Petrilli, Megan Mack, Jennifer Janowitz Petrilli, Andy Hickner, Sanjay Saint, Vineet Chopra |
| Abstract |
Despite a growing body of literature, uncertainty regarding the influence of physician dress on patients' perceptions exists. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to examine the influence of physician attire on patient perceptions including trust, satisfaction and confidence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 210 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 47 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 14% |
| Spain | 22 | 10% |
| Canada | 13 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Thailand | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 24% |
| Scientists | 36 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 63 | 25% |
| Unknown | 60 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 77 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#123,844
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#239
of 25,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,332
of 362,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#4
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.