↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Oncogenic Role of THOR, a Conserved Cancer/Testis Long Non-coding RNA

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Oncogenic Role of THOR, a Conserved Cancer/Testis Long Non-coding RNA
Published in
Cell, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuyuki Hosono, Yashar S. Niknafs, John R. Prensner, Matthew K. Iyer, Saravana M. Dhanasekaran, Rohit Mehra, Sethuramasundaram Pitchiaya, Jean Tien, June Escara-Wilke, Anton Poliakov, Shih-Chun Chu, Sahal Saleh, Keerthana Sankar, Fengyun Su, Shuling Guo, Yuanyuan Qiao, Susan M. Freier, Huynh-Hoa Bui, Xuhong Cao, Rohit Malik, Timothy M. Johnson, David G. Beer, Felix Y. Feng, Weibin Zhou, Arul M. Chinnaiyan

Abstract

Large-scale transcriptome sequencing efforts have vastly expanded the catalog of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) with varying evolutionary conservation, lineage expression, and cancer specificity. Here, we functionally characterize a novel ultraconserved lncRNA, THOR (ENSG00000226856), which exhibits expression exclusively in testis and a broad range of human cancers. THOR knockdown and overexpression in multiple cell lines and animal models alters cell or tumor growth supporting an oncogenic role. We discovered a conserved interaction of THOR with IGF2BP1 and show that THOR contributes to the mRNA stabilization activities of IGF2BP1. Notably, transgenic THOR knockout produced fertilization defects in zebrafish and also conferred a resistance to melanoma onset. Likewise, ectopic expression of human THOR in zebrafish accelerated the onset of melanoma. THOR represents a novel class of functionally important cancer/testis lncRNAs whose structure and function have undergone positive evolutionary selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 23%
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#267,152
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,464
of 17,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,820
of 445,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#36
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.