↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Recovery after critical illness: putting the puzzle together—a consensus of 29

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
175 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Recovery after critical illness: putting the puzzle together—a consensus of 29
Published in
Critical Care, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1887-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elie Azoulay, Jean-Louis Vincent, Derek C. Angus, Yaseen M. Arabi, Laurent Brochard, Stephen J. Brett, Giuseppe Citerio, Deborah J. Cook, Jared Randall Curtis, Claudia C. dos Santos, E. Wesley Ely, Jesse Hall, Scott D. Halpern, Nicholas Hart, Ramona O. Hopkins, Theodore J. Iwashyna, Samir Jaber, Nicola Latronico, Sangeeta Mehta, Dale M. Needham, Judith Nelson, Kathleen Puntillo, Michael Quintel, Kathy Rowan, Gordon Rubenfeld, Greet Van den Berghe, Johannes Van der Hoeven, Hannah Wunsch, Margaret Herridge, Azoulay, Elie, Vincent, Jean-Louis, Angus, Derek C., Arabi, Yaseen M., Brochard, Laurent, Brett, Stephen J., Citerio, Giuseppe, Cook, Deborah J., Curtis, Jared Randall, dos Santos, Claudia C., Ely, E. Wesley, Hall, Jesse, Halpern, Scott D., Hart, Nicholas, Hopkins, Ramona O., Iwashyna, Theodore J., Jaber, Samir, Latronico, Nicola, Mehta, Sangeeta, Needham, Dale M., Nelson, Judith, Puntillo, Kathleen, Quintel, Michael, Rowan, Kathy, Rubenfeld, Gordon, Van den Berghe, Greet, Van der Hoeven, Johannes, Wunsch, Hannah, Herridge, Margaret

Abstract

In this review, we seek to highlight how critical illness and critical care affect longer-term outcomes, to underline the contribution of ICU delirium to cognitive dysfunction several months after ICU discharge, to give new insights into ICU acquired weakness, to emphasize the importance of value-based healthcare, and to delineate the elements of family-centered care. This consensus of 29 also provides a perspective and a research agenda about post-ICU recovery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 64%
Unspecified 12 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#110,288
of 11,564,444 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#57
of 3,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,169
of 306,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,564,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.